Comment

11-03-19 - Selah

Selah

Indianapolis First Friends Quaker Meeting

Pastor Bob Henry

November 3, 2019

Psalm 46 (NRSV)  Pew Bible: p. 450

1 God is our refuge and strength,
    a very present help in trouble.
2 Therefore we will not fear, though the earth should change,
    though the mountains shake in the heart of the sea;
3 though its waters roar and foam,
    though the mountains tremble with its tumult.Selah

4 There is a river whose streams make glad the city of God,
    the holy habitation of the Most High.
5 God is in the midst of the city; it shall not be moved;
    God will help it when the morning dawns.
6 The nations are in an uproar, the kingdoms totter;
    he utters his voice, the earth melts.
7 The Lord of hosts is with us;
    the God of Jacob is our refuge.  Selah

8 Come, behold the works of the Lord;
    see what desolations he has brought on the earth.
9 He makes wars cease to the end of the earth;
    he breaks the bow, and shatters the spear;
    he burns the shields with fire.
10 “Be still, and know that I am God!
    I am exalted among the nations,
    I am exalted in the earth.”
11 The Lord of hosts is with us;
    the God of Jacob is our refuge.  Selah

 

 

Probably because of all the photos I post of the beautiful sunrises on social media, many of you know that each day after I get Sue and the boys off to work and the bus, I take my morning walk. It has become a sacred and centering time for me. The cool air and vigorous walk clear my brain and allow me the needed time to reconnect with nature, my neighbors, and the Creator God I thank for it all. 

Often as I walk, I find myself giving thanks for my family, my life, and this Meeting that I not only consider my faith community, but that I have the honor and privilege of serving each and every day. I also often remember those suffering from illnesses or suffering with mental, emotional, or physical pain, and I take a moment to lift their names to the rising of a new day filled with hope.

One day this week as I was walking, I had a moment of divine clarity and direction. Like George Fox before me, I felt God was speaking to my condition and even the condition of our Meeting.  What came to mind was not a long message, detailed directions, or even a vision – rather it was simply one word: SELAH

Now, before I explain that word, I want to give some context. When I started our current sermon series, It’s Time to Get Moving: Quakerism for Today back in September, I knew God had stirred me to wrestle with some heavy topics and craft a set of teaching sermons to address the brokenness of Quakerism and the needed direction for its successful future.  I knew the series would speak to more than just First Friends – and it has – as I have received messaged from other states and even countries.

Please understand, after two years of conversations and integrating our family into this Meeting, I have learned a great deal (by no means everything) of the great diversity on so many levels here at First Friends. I deeply value that diversity and what it offers us as a body. Just facilitating the conversations in Seeking Friends each week has been a clear eye-opener to the spectrum of beliefs that this place holds. Many in that class can attest to the beauty of our differences and the importance of learning from each another.  As well, attending Yearly Meeting events over the last couple of years have also at times been eye-openers and often left me wondering where First Friends fits in and our place in the future of our Yearly Meeting. These are just a couple of the reasons why I was (and continue to be) hopeful that these sermons could help us transcend our beliefs, and institutional structures, and find a way here at First Friends to “get moving” and keep the vigor and excitement around this place fresh, challenging, and growing. 

One thing I have learned in my 25 years in ministry is that sermons can be conversations starters, as well as, fire starters. It is typical with any diverse group, that some sermons and conversations will take time to process. Let’s admit it, some are hard and need time to percolate and brew in our hearts and among us.  It is very similar to Quaker Business or Waiting Worship when we need time to pause and reflect on what we have just heard, so the words can settle into our hearts - the very reason we often sit in silence for a time before someone else speaks.

I believe it has been extremely clear when talking with many you throughout the week that First Friends has a hunger for deeper conversations, for deeper thinking, and even deeper relationships among us and within our community. But as I have shared openly from my own journey, this deeper path often takes time.

During the current sermon series, I have used the analogy of migration and making a needed move in our thinking or beliefs – but even migration takes seasons - geese flying south don’t arrive in a day as we would flying in a plane.   

Thus we need time to chew, time to reflect, and time to query about our own responses and beliefs.    

That being said, I am also very pleased to see the actions and conversations that have already begun during this time. I have been humbled to be part of so many conversations of healing that have taken place as we have grappled with difficult church history, our understanding of God and faith, and finding the Quaker Way rooted in Love.

I am moved by the desire of many in our meeting to actually do something tangible like address the safety of 5G networks, or start a discussion on how we can make a difference with payday lending in our own Glendale neighborhood or seek ways to use our property to preserve our ecological priorities and continue to teach our testimonies.  These are just a few of the many conversations and actions that have begun in the recent months.

Now, let me return to Selah.  The word Selah is used 74 times in the Bible in only two books – Psalms and Habakkuk.  It is a mysterious word that has no specific meaning. It often appears in more lyrical or poetic verse, because many believe it was a liturgical or musical mark.  Scholars consider it an instruction for the musician or reader to stop and listen or take a needed pause to reflect on what happened just before or the words prior to the pause.

To receive this word as I walked the other morning was not alarming, but more affirmation that we have been doing really hard work.  We have been wrestling with difficult, but important things, and our cups are full and overflowing…and this includes my own.

So, this morning, I am declaring Selah on this sermon series.  It is time to stop and listen, it is time to take a needed pause to reflect. 

Please note: that does not mean that the final 5 sermons are being scrapped or I am going in a different direction. We will return and finish them in a new season after the holidays – after taking our Selah. 

For those in the meeting that are ready for more, or those online waiting for the next sermon to drop, I am simply asking you to pause, listen, and reflect. For those who attend or listen occasionally, maybe take some time during November to go back and listen to the sermons you missed. They were meant to build on each other while laying a foundation for us as a thriving progressive Quaker community. Folks, First Friends is a unique and special place. I believe (as many of you do) that we are the face of a new kind of Quakerism that can take us into the future with hope and stability. Also, if you return to the messages or reflect back over the last couple months, take some time to reflect on your own responses to these messages, what stirred your passions, what rubbed you the wrong way, and why?, what response did they inspire?  And then find sometime to have a conversation with someone (maybe someone different than you at our meeting) or make a coffee date or lunch with me or Beth to discuss what is being stirred up in your heart.  As I said when speaking at FUM’s Stoking the Fire this summer, “Having conversations are vital to the survival and growth of Friends. When we stop having conversations and assume we have it all figured out then we begin to die.”     

So, let us enter our Selah today – take time to reflect, listen, and pause and see how God has been and continues to speak to you and us as a community.

Queries to Ponder:

  • Where do I need to stop an listen or take a needed pause in my life?

  • What is being stirred in my heart?

  • What is rubbing me the wrong way? And why?

  • In what way am I being led to respond?

Comment

Comment

10-20-19 - God for Us All

God for Us All

Indianapolis First Friends Quaker Meeting

Pastor Bob Henry

October 20, 2019

 

Philippians 2:1-11

 

Therefore if you have any encouragement from being united with Christ, if any comfort from his love, if any common sharing in the Spirit, if any tenderness and compassion, 2 then make my joy complete by being like-minded, having the same love, being one in spirit and of one mind. 3 Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit. Rather, in humility value others above yourselves, 4 not looking to your own interests but each of you to the interests of the others.

 

5 In your relationships with one another, have the same mindset as Christ Jesus:

6 Who, being in very nature God,
    did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage;
7 rather, he made himself nothing
    by taking the very nature of a servant,
    being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man,
    he humbled himself
    by becoming obedient to death—
        even death on a cross!

 

9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place
    and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow,
    in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue acknowledge that Jesus Christ is Lord,
    to the glory of God the Father.

 

 

Since this morning we are going to be talking about God, I thought as good Quakers we should start by going to the authorities on God – children.  If you thought you had some questions about God, just listen to some of the questions that children out there have.  They will get you thinking (and possibly laughing). These are actual questions children have asked which I found on a parenting blog titled, “CafeMom.”

  1. "Why did God make mosquitoes? All they do is bite you? Why would God do that?!"

  2. "Why does God stay in heaven and not come down to earth to visit?"

  3. "I think my 4-year-old son got confused when we told him that God watches over us. He said 'Wait, so God is Santa Claus?'"

  4. "Did Jesus get potty trained as fast as me?"

  5. "How did Jesus even rise from the grave? Did he punch out of his grave and say, 'This isn’t the last of Jesus!'?"

  6. "Is Jesus a zombie?"

  7. "Can God read our minds?"

  8. "Is Santa God's really rich brother?'

  9. "'Mommy, is that God?' referring to the priest marrying my sister-in-law and her husband."

  10. "When my son was about 4 or 5, and it started to rain while we were walking back from the park, he asked me if it was God peeing on us."

  11. "If God saw that it was not good for Adam to be alone... how come He never made himself a wife?"

  12. "If God sees everything, does he watch us in the shower?"

  13. "I teach preschool Sunday school and ... I talked about Jesus as the Good Shepherd and how He will leave 99 sheep to find one lost one. One little boy piped up, 'Did Jesus live in a zoo?'"

  14. "Why does he have horns? Does he headbutt the other gods?"

  15. "So, was he a vampire?"

  16. "When my oldest was about 3, we found a baby bird in the yard that had fallen from its nest. When I went to check on it the next morning, it had died. When I took the kids out to play, I discreetly scooped him up, put him in a bag and in the trash. When we came in, my son said, 'Mama, what happened to that baby bird?' Trying to skirt the issue, I said, 'Oh, you don't have to worry about that baby bird, he lives with Jesus now.' He looked at me thoughtfully for a few moments and said, 'Jesus lives in the trash?'"

  17. "Did Jesus practice walking on water first? How can I do it?"

  18. "If Jesus doesn't have a sister, why do I need to have one?"

This morning, I would like us to explore what we know and believe about God. And just like those kids, it is always acceptable among Friends – and especially here at First Friends to ask questions. So, allow yourself to be open and inquisitive this morning.

Much of what I talked about last week, as hard as it was to wrestle with and try and understand, reflects too well what many people believe about God.

Countless people have a picture of God that is violent, domineering, controlling, and supreme in many of the wrong ways. This concept and understanding of God often comes from what traditionally theologians call “omni-theology.”  Now, many of us in this very meetinghouse were probably raised with omni-theology where we used these descriptors to explain God

omnipresent – God is everywhere.

omniscient – God is all knowing.

omnipotent – God is all mighty or the supreme being. 

 

Yet, while I was being taught this omni-theology in my conformation class at the age of 13 a fellow classmate raised his hand and asked a poignant question,

 

If God is all powerful, can He create a rock so large He cannot pick it up?

 

and the questions continued to grow. Sadly, the bible didn’t help me on this one…because if you look carefully you will find verses and stories in the bible that refute every one of those attributes.  As well, the bible is filled with paradoxes that get one’s mind spinning in thought.  I remember a time when my mind went spinning and this is what it kind of sounded like…

 

Either God wants to abolish evil and cannot,

or he can, but does not want to,

or he cannot and does not want to.

 

If he wants to, but cannot, he is impotent.

If he can, but does not want to, then he is wicked.

If he neither can, nor wants to, he is both powerless and wicked.

 

Like I said, all this can very quickly have our heads spinning.  If you enjoy this type of thinking…I have an opportunity for you…it’s called seminary…there is a lot of head spinning that goes on there. Just ask Beth Henricks about that with her current class on postmodernity in her Master of Divinity program at Earlham School of Religion.

 

Anyway, as soon as the questions were adequately satisfied (which they never were) my confirmation teacher (who was also my pastor) would quickly move to another statement about God, which went like this,

 

“To really see who God is, we must look at Jesus.”

 

Now, Jesus was much more relatable. Jesus was much more tangible. Jesus was much more human and did things that humans, like me, did.  And yet, Jesus wasn’t really much like this “God” we were just discussing.  Rather confusing if you really think about.  So many other theologies and explanations had to be created to make it all work and make sense, that often we just went with it. Since most of the confirmands just wanted to get through the class so they could take communion and say they drank wine at church. We often moved on, leaving me with lots of questions. 

 

Actually, looking at Jesus was probably the best suggestion or move we could make (back then and today), because the God we would see in Jesus is much different – instead of lightning bolts or wrathful threats the God of Jesus took up a water basin and a towel and declared forgiveness, brought reconciliation, proclaimed good news for all, and had compassion for people who did not know the way of shalom and love.       

 

In the biblical chapter of my doctoral dissertation I traced the concept of shalom (which means to bring into peaceful wholeness) from Genesis to Revelation and found often in both the Old and New Testaments a God who was seeking first and foremost this way of shalom rooted in love. Too often scripture shows this shalom-seeking God being overshadowed by the actions, beliefs, or desires of the God-followers – leaving God waiting patiently on them to seek the way of shalom and love for themselves. (To me, this “waiting patiently” definitely shows that God must be a Quaker).

 

Finally, when Jesus appears on Earth or as it says in The Message, “when he moved into the neighborhood,” he was able to show them tangibly a new way.  Yet many still refused to follow His way, always adding more and more to convolute and detract from his simplicity. Ironically, this was exactly what Jesus was always questioning the religious authorities of his day about – they loved adding rules and hoops to jump through.  Yet, Jesus was trying to get them back to the essentials of shalom and love, all while they believed they had better ideas. Ideas that would lead to many of the atrocities we talked about last week.  

 

Also, for Jesus, God was supreme, but not in a supremacy as-we-know-it-today kind of way – Instead Jesus always was trying to show God as the supreme healer, supreme friend, supreme lover, supreme life-giver…so much so that God would ultimately empty himself for the benefit of ALL people.  Listen again to how Paul explained it to the Philippians:

 

6 Who, being in very nature God,
    did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage;
7 rather, he made himself nothing
    by taking the very nature of a servant,
    being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man,
    he humbled himself
    by becoming obedient to death—
        even death on a cross!

 

What Jesus did was give us a brand new and radical understanding of God. He flipped our understanding completely upside down. The domineering, wrathful, violent God had now become just the opposite – nondominating, nonwrathful, nonviolent, and supreme in self-giving and service.

 

Let’s be honest, this God that Jesus was trying to show us, I believe, makes much more sense, because first and foremost we hopefully want to relate to this image of God.

 

Actually, as Quakers who believe that there is that of God in every person, this means even more. It means that we not only can relate, but we should be emulating, or even better yet, incarnating this God that Jesus is showing us in our everyday lives. 

 

We should be working hard on becoming nondominating, nonwrathful, nonviolent people who seek ways to be supreme in self-giving and service to ALL people.  Then our neighbors will be able to see “that of God in us.”

 

Now, before we embark on emulating and incarnating this way, we probably need to do some self-work. That means we are going to have to ask ourselves some difficult queries to help us process where we are struggling with living this way, currently.

 

We should ask ourselves something like this…

 

·        Who deep down do I want to dominate?  Who do I want to exercise control over? Who don’t I mind belittling, shaming, or making feel less-than for my own benefit or desires?

 

·        Who experiences my fierce anger the easiest? Do they deserve it? Have I tried to understand him/her, and have I taken the time to look inside myself at the root of my own wrath?  (If wrath is truly at its deepest root a corollary of love – let’s seek to tap into the love instead of producing angry responses.)

 

·        Who undeservedly receives my violent responses, or who do I wish them upon?  How often have I wished someone removed from my life (even dead), or wanted to physically hurt someone to make myself feel better? (I used to think this sounded out there, but violence today takes many forms.  – bullying or emotional violence or intimidation is a violent act that is often used by youth on the internet, as well as people in Fortune 500 companies. I don’t know how many times, I have heard people say, “Well, if we could just get rid of that person (or those people) our problems would be solved.” Do we really mean that?  All you have to do is a take a look at a list of the things that cause PTSD in people and you will see how varied violent responses really are and the effects they have on each of us.)        

 

Just by asking ourselves those three queries we are quick to realize how important it is to work on becoming less dominate, less wrathful, and less violent. As we do, it is easier to see how we might be able to give, serve, and ultimately begin to seek shalom and love our neighbor as ourselves.

 

Instead of emulating the old view of God which produces many of the things we talked about last week, if we emulate the God we see in Jesus then we might just begin to heal our world starting in our own areas of influence (family, work, relationships, church, etc.) I will be the first to admit, it is never easy being humbled.  It isn’t easy trying to focus on putting others before ourselves. And often the last thing we want to do is willingly sacrifice our own desires to see others healed, reconciled, and successful in their pursuits. But when we do, others will be able to see that of a hopeful, loving, gracious, and kind God inside each of us.

 

That there is the way of Jesus rooted in love that we have been talking about throughout this series.

 

During our time of waiting worship, I challenge us to sit on those queries I read earlier, which can be found on the back of your bulletin.

 

·        Who deep down do I want to dominate?

·        Who experiences my fierce anger the easiest?

·        Who undeservedly receives my violent responses, or who do I wish them upon? 

 

And allow your Inner Light to speak to your condition this morning.  If you feel led to share out of the silence, please stand and a microphone will be brought to you.

  

Comment

Comment

10-13-19 - Eyes Wide Open: Awakening to the Atrocities

Eyes Wide Open: Awakening to the Atrocities

Indianapolis First Friends Quaker Meeting

Pastor Bob Henry

October 13, 2019

 

1 John 3:14-18 (NRSV)

4 We know that we have passed from death to life because we love one another. Whoever does not love abides in death. 15 All who hate a brother or sister[e] are murderers, and you know that murderers do not have eternal life abiding in them. 16 We know love by this, that he laid down his life for us—and we ought to lay down our lives for one another. 17 How does God’s love abide in anyone who has the world’s goods and sees a brother or sister[f] in need and yet refuses help?

18 Little children, let us love, not in word or speech, but in truth and action.

 

 

I want to begin this morning by asking a question. Have you ever had your eyes opened to a new way of thinking, a new perspective, a new reality? 

 

Now, I know most of us have had that “aha” moment, where things clicked into place and we found clarity, but what I am talking about this morning is a little different than that.  I am talking about a moment when you thought you knew what was going on, you were comfortable and content, and then, all of a sudden you were not, something was stirred up that didn’t settle. Maybe you even had some doubts, questions, or simply needed to go on a discovery.    

 

As I have been prepping for this sermon, I have realized that, for me, many of these moments have come while reading books.  Actually, one of the earliest memories of having my eyes opened, was late in high school when a teacher challenged me to read J. D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye.  How many of you have read that book?

 

The main character Holden Caulfield a troubled teen facing psychological troubles and expelled from high school at the age of 16 was just the opposite of everything I was and stood for in high school. It opened my eyes to seeing the pain and struggle of others my age different than me. Today, Catcher in the Rye is one of the most well-known banned books. I am glad it wasn’t banned when I was growing up, because it helped me see from a different perspective.    

 

 

This all had me thinking as I sat in my office this week and perused the books on my shelves. Soon, I had a stack of books on my desk that I consider to have opened my eyes, that have changed my perspectives, that have given me a new reality. Some caused me some anguish and I really had to wrestle with them, even put them down or throw across the room - only to pick up later (probably because I wasn’t ready for what they had to say at the time).  Once I read them though, I walked away asking different questions about everything from the church, the world, relationships, and yes, even God. 

 

The first book I pulled off my shelf just happened to be by Quaker Richard Foster.  Foster’s book, Streams of Living Water, had me wrestling with the idea that all the different Christian traditions have something to offer to one’s overall faith experience. For the first time, I realized that I might have missed out by not exploring traditions other than the one I had grown up with. Later on, I would be introduced to another book “A Generous Orthodoxy” by Brian McLaren that would expand these thoughts even further and help me see value in faiths outside the Christian traditions.

 

Another book I pulled off my shelf, was one I was given over a lunch with a colleague at Huntington University. Unbeknownst to me, this book would have me searching inwardly for answers about violence and how I might respond.  The book’s title alone, If a violent person threaten to harm a loved one…What Would You Do? by John Yoder drew me in. For the first time, I was challenged by the idea of pacifism and non-violent responses as a valid and even biblical way.  Hard to grasp for someone raised to accept capital punishment, just war, and domination of one’s enemies.

 

The next book I pulled off my shelf, was a suggestion from my friend, Jesse (who you may remember from our Labor of Love celebration a couple years ago).  He had mentioned this intriguing title, Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria? And other Conversations on Race by psychologist Beverly Daniel Tatum. Until reading that book, I didn’t realize the impact of racism all around me, and how much personal work needed to take place.    

 

In October of 2006, I remember being glued to the TV as news of a horrific shooting of 10 schoolgirls took place in a surprisingly shocking place, Nickel Mines, Pennsylvania in the heart of Amish country.  Within that year I was reading the book, Amish Grace, written by three professors of historic peace universities.  The book disrupted my understanding of grace and forgiveness. It sat me down and made me take another look.  For the first time, I wasn’t sure how forgiveness could transcend tragedy, or if I wanted it to, even though the Amish had showed the way. That book ended up on the pile.

 

Out of this struggle on forgiveness and grace, I happened upon a book, If Grace Is True by a Quaker guy that many of us know named Phil Gulley.  Many of you have read this book, and it changed your life, or at least it opened your eyes wider to wrestle with universal grace for all.  Not easy for someone who was taught that their faith tradition was the true faith and most, if not all others, were wrong and that hell and fear tactics were ways to keep people safe and in-line.    

 

All of a sudden, my office desk was completely covered with books. Here are just a few other titles that opened my eyes wider…

 

·        Velvet Elvis: Repainting the Christian Faith by Rob Bell (this was one of the books I threw across the room and put down several times before realizing the wealth of wisdom inside).

·        A Year of Biblical Womanhood by Rachel Held Evans challenged the way I saw the role of women in the Bible.

·        Chasing Francis: A Pilgrims Tale by Ian Morgan Cron had me seeing the challenges of a pastor who began seeing things differently and the toll it would take on him.

 

I could go on and on with book after book…but for this sermon I would like to focus in on one book that really opened my eyes wide.  That book was Dee Brown’s Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee.  No book, at that point in my life, had opened my eyes as wide. Actually, I related to what Hampton Sides wrote in the new forward to the book.  He said,  

 

“It was as if someone threw a switch….it was as though Bury My Heart had caused Americans to rethink everything, to reset the moral compass, to start over again.” 

 

That described my experience well.  I will never forget being on vacation in Friendship, Wisconsin with our young family.  The cabin we were staying in had no T.V. or internet (actually we didn’t even own smart phones, yet).  Sue and I had put our young boys to bed and settled for the night in a couple of comfy chairs with the books that we had brought with us. I had become accustomed to bringing a book to read on vacation for several years, but I had no idea what I had gotten myself into with Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee.

 

Now remember, I grew up right here in Indiana. I visited Chief Little Turtle’s grave when I was in grade school. I learned of the Miami Indians that originally settled the territories that make up parts of Indiana and Ohio. I learned of the conquest, the struggle of the First Nations people, and even experienced the reservation system in Oklahoma while working in Texas, but what I was not ready for was the role Christianity and the Church played in the removal and genocide of the Indians from their land in America.  

 

Just as Dee Brown began chapter one, I want to take us back this morning to what opened my eyes so wide, and that starts with Christopher Columbus.  I find it ironic, that tomorrow, Monday, October 14 is a holiday in our country – for some it is Columbus Day and for a growing number of folks it is Indigenous People’s Day. Dee Brown introduced me to why a growing number of people are not so fond of celebrating Columbus’ discovery.

 

To understand Christopher Columbus’ mission a little better, we have to go back a few years and read the papal (the pope’s) proclamation of 1455 that empowered Christian kings of Europe to enslave, plunder, and slaughter in the name of discovery.  Here is how it reads,

 

invade, search out, capture, vanquish, and subdue all Saracens [Muslims] and pagans whatsoever, and other enemies of Christ wherever placed, and the kingdoms, dukedoms, principalities, dominions, possessions, and all movable and immovable goods whatsoever held and possessed by them and to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery, and to apply and appropriate to himself and his successors the kingdoms, dukedoms, counties, principalities, dominions, possessions, and goods, and to convert them to his and their use and profit.

 

This was the basis for what we commonly call the Doctrine of Discovery.  This papal proclamation is what created Christianity’s justification of colonialism.  

 

On a side note...take a moment to think about this…not only is it quite ironic that we have a steeple on our Meetinghouse when George Fox and early Quakers railed against such things, it is even more ironic that as Quakers we sit within a building which is considered “colonial” in style, with pews facing forward, and a pulpit – all symbols of the deep colonial influence on our recent past.  Something we may someday want to rethink about this space.    

 

Now, back to what I was saying…as I continued through the atrocities being exposed in Dee Brown’s book, I simply found myself in tears, sometimes in shock, and often wondering how people who had come to America for Religious Freedom, even called themselves Christian, could be so far from the way rooted in love which Christ taught and lived. 

 

What the early Christian settlers did on Native Land and to native people in the name of God made me sick.    

 

But then, I began to notice that history repeated itself. 

 

We don’t have to look hard to find what was named the Crusades in our history books. The Crusades were the papal proclamation in real-time. (My Christian grade school mascot all through from Kindergarten through 8th grade here in Indiana was a Crusader – on my school gymnasium wall was a picture of a knight in armor on a horse with a huge sword with a cross on it. And we didn’t see any harm in that image.).

 

At the same time the Native American Tragedies were happening in America, stories were being reported of Christian atrocities happening in the Caribbean, Central America, and South America as well. For that matter they would continue in America to only get worse for the First Nations tribes with the Trail of Tears, Abraham Lincoln’s Mass Execution of 39 indigenous people in 1862, the Sand Creek Massacre in Colorado, and then Wounded Knee.

 

And this supremacy in America didn’t stop there, the Christian Church would continue and be very involved with the African slave trade which was not only in America but throughout the world. Brian McLaren points out that Pope Urban VIII (8th) even realized the atrocities that were set in motion and reversed the proclamation declaring slavery unacceptable in the mid-17th century, but the majority of Protestant Christians in America and in other countries considered slavery and white supremacy to be absolutely consistent with “biblical” Christianity.

 

What reading Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee did for me, was open my eyes wide to the church’s involvement throughout history of removing people that did not fit the mold or would not conform or be “converted” to the form.  Where was the way of Jesus rooted in love?

 

I sat crying in the cabin in Friendship, Wisconsin because as I looked around me (and sadly as I look around me still today 10+ years later) I see the church falling utilizing those same power moves. We have just moved on to another people group…from the Samaritans back in Jesus’ day, to the Muslims and others that were obliterated during the crusades, to our own First Nations people, Africans Americans, the LGBTQ Community, the elderly, the mentally challenged, even Democrats (or Republicans), you name it today – anyone that this type of Christian wants to control, dominate, and force to conform are targets. 

 

Brian McLaren tells a story in “The Great Spiritual Migration” that really emphasizes what I am talking about, He introduces it by saying,

 

“Christianity, we might say, is driving around with a loaded gun in its glove compartment, and that loaded gun is its violent image of God. It’s driving around with a license to kill, and that license is the Bible, read uncritically.  Along with its loaded gun and license to kill, it’s driving around with a sense of entitlement derived from a set of beliefs with a long, ugly, and largely unacknowledged history.”

 

Then Brian tells the story.

____________________

“All of this became disturbingly clear to me several months after September 11, 2001.  I was lecturing at a famous seminary in a famous city. As I walked from the subway to the school in the golden late-afternoon light, I noticed that the neighborhood around the school was populated primarily by Hindu and Muslim immigrants.  With images of 9/11 still in my memory, I couldn’t stop wondering if there was any neighborly interchange between the Christian seminarians inside the walls and the Muslim and Hindu mothers, fathers, kids, and grandparents I passed on the sidewalk outside. In my lecture that evening, the memory of their faces drew me off script, and I said to the seminarians and faculty present:

 

If I were a neighbor of this seminary, one of the Muslim or Hindu people who live their lives just outside your walls, there is one question I would have in my mind about you.  It is not the question of what your doctrines are. It is not the question of what your religious practices and rituals are.  I would only have one question.

 

Then, for a dramatic effect, I pulled out my wallet and from it extracted a credit card, which I raised above my head:

 

I would want to know if you at this seminary keep the genocide card in your theological wallet in your back pocket.  I would want to know if there are any circumstances under which you might, in God’s name and on the authority of the Bible that you are here to study, sanction the killing of my wife, my children, my parents, and me – as infidels, heathens, pagans, the unsaved, the unredeemed.

 

As you’d expect, a rather confused silence followed. I added:

 

In an age of religious violence like ours, people care much less about what you believe, and more about whether you will kill for what you believe.  So if you haven’t figured out what you’re going to do with passages like Deuteronomy 7 and 1 Samuel 15 and Paslams 137:9, you still have some important work to do. If you haven’t grappled with these passages and other like them, your Bible is like a loaded gun and your theology is like a license to kill.  You have to find a way to disarm your faith as a potential instrument of hate and convert it into an instrument of love. You have to convert Christianity from a warrior religion to a reconciling religion.  Otherwise, your neighbors around this seminary will tolerate you the way they might tolerate a chemical plant that could at any moment blow up and kill them all. 

There was a big crowd that night, with some students sitting on the floor.  Immediately, a student named Gavin near the front quite dramatically rose to his feet. He too pulled out his wallet and he too pulled out a card and waved it for dramatic effect. “I strongly disagree,” he said.  “If something is in the Word of God, then we must keep it in our pocket at all times, including passages that reveal God as violent. If the Bible reveals that God is violent, and if God commands us to do violence, it must be a just and holy violence, so I will defend it with my life.”  Some students nodded affirmatively as he sat down.  A few may have even clapped and said amen.  Others grew wide-eyed, as they had no idea what was going on, except that it wasn’t what usually went on at their seminary.

 

Bang. There it was. You can be a good Christian, at least in the minds of some seminarians at some highly regarded schools, and boldly uphold the right to kill people of other religions in the name of Jesus, because you can justify it with a chapter and verse in the Bible.

 

Although I think Gavin was dangerously wrong, I’m still grateful to him for speaking up. He did everyone present an important service that night.  His courage to say out loud what many people quietly think forced everyone in the room to give the relationship between Christianity, love, and violence a second thought.

_________________

 

As Quakers, I think we need to ask ourselves, do we carry a “genocide card” in our pocket or a “loaded gun” in our glove compartment? Do we somewhere deep down believe in a violent God who promotes just and holy violence? Do we ever use the Bible as weapon?

 

I hope that as Quakers the answer to those are all “no.” But let’s be honest, there have been times when we have failed.  There were Quakers who owned slaves – while Levi and Catherine Coffin were working to set them free.  There were segregated Quaker Meetings where blacks were only allowed to worship from the balcony.  There were and still are Quakers who oppress women in leadership rolls and Quakers who believe Islam and Muslims are all like their extremist factions.  There are Quakers who believe immigrants and refuges need to stay out of our country whether in danger or not, that LGBTQ folks have no place in a meeting unless they make a change.  And there are Quakers who are in favor of gentrification and the moving out of brown-skinned people out of neighborhoods without even knowing what they are doing.

 

But at First Friends and throughout Quakerdom, my hope is that instead of being a people who pull out “genocide cards” or seek to discriminate in the name of God for power or profit, we would be constantly seeking a return to that Quaker way rooted in love - or as our own Faith and Practice says, “God’s Law of Love.”  Just listen, in light of what I have shared this morning, to two short sections of our Faith and Practice.   

 

The Friends “…conception of a Light Within as an endowment of persons makes it impossible for Friends to draw lines of distinction in capacity or privilege between different races or nations.”  

 

Friends believe that any racial discrimination is essentially a violation of God’s law of love, whether legal enactment or by inequitable practices which interfere with democratic liberties or cultural or economic development. To dwell together in friendly relations on a basis of mutual respect, courtesy, and understanding works toward the fulfillment of this law of love.

 

The atrocities of our past, do not need be the atrocities of our future. In a world that still is buying into Doctrines of Discovery and Dominion but not into the stewardship and care of our neighbors and the earth, Quakers must show the way. It is our time to be an example of voice again, to live by “God’s Law of Love” and reverse the patterns that many Christians and even Quakers have and continue to buy into. 

 

As we enter into waiting worship, I want to read to you and those listening online the queries for this morning:

 

  • What lately has caused my eyes to be wide open?

  • Do I carry a “genocide card” in my pocket?

  • What atrocities are we facing, today, and how might the Church help instead of hinder? What might be First Friend’s role in addressing these atrocities?

Comment

Comment

10-06-19 - When Love is the Way

When Love is the Way

Indianapolis First Friends Quaker Meeting

Pastor Bob Henry

October 6, 2019

 

1 John 4:20-21 (NRSV)

20 Those who say, “I love God,” and hate their brothers or sisters are liars; for those who do not love a brother or sister whom they have seen, cannot love God whom they have not seen. 21 The commandment we have from him is this: those who love God must love their brothers and sisters also.

 

 

This morning, on this World Quaker Day, I want to return to where we left off last week, which was, what does it mean for Quakers to again embrace the way of Jesus rooted in love. 

 

One Sunday after a Meeting for Worship in Oregon, I had a member come up to me and inform me that my preaching about love was simply a social gospel and not the “true gospel of Jesus.” Finding this interesting yet a bit confusing since I was teaching on Jesus’ actual words about love, I stated that I thought love was big enough to contain both a social gospel and whatever he was claiming the gospel of Jesus was (between you and me, I saw no difference between the two). So, I asked him to help me understand how he saw the gospel of Jesus. He emphatically and with wagging finger said I should spend more time preaching about sins and how to get right with Jesus. Saying, “People need to know they are sinners and in need of a savior – that is the gospel.” 

 

So, what happened to the gospel being about good news? – actually I am pretty sure the word “gospel” literally means “good news.”  When did it get turned into knowing we are sinners? Let’s be honest, I think we all know too well that we miss the mark, that we fail, make bad choices, seek revenge, hurt and slander others…I could go on and on… 

 

But do we all know that we are loved?   [Pause]

 

I believe that may be getting more to the root of the gospel – the good news that our world so desperately needs and is hungering for today.  I have shared before that in Oregon, I would often end our Meeting for Worship with a benediction that included the phrase, “God loves you, God is not mad at you, and God will never leave you nor forsake you.”  Just speaking those words changed people’s lives.  I would see tears flow as I said them. People would remark that those words gave them hope because for too long they had been told God was made at them and didn’t love them unless they lived an impossible life.    

 

Telling people they are loved, showing them they are loved, and allowing them to love in return is more than just good news, it was the way of Jesus. 

 

Take for example the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5-7), Brian McLaren points out that

 

“Jesus makes an audacious statement:  God generously showers both the good and evil with rain and sun.  In other words, God’s love is completely nondiscriminatory. God loves us not because we are so deserving and lovable, but because God is so loving, without limitation or discrimination.”

 

Actually, Jesus emphasized this point by saying that true perfection and maturity which we should aspire toward, is love without discrimination because that is how God loves. 

 

How often is our love discriminatory in our world today? [Pause]  

 

Jesus showed us through example after example that love is the center of everything he did. 

·        His disciples see a bunch of pesky kids and want to send them away – Jesus welcomes them.

·        His disciples see a woman from another culture hated by the Jews and wants to send her away – Jesus listens to her and meets her needs.

·        A crowd refuses to acknowledge Zaccheaus – Jesus sees him and treats him with dignity and respect – even goes to his home for a meal. 

·        A group of nobility at a formal banquet looks down upon a disreputable women – Jesus sees her as someone who has loved much and so must be forgiven much.

 

And there are so many more examples…even at the end of his life as he is giving his farewell speech to his followers, Jesus makes it simple, summing it up very Quakerly I might add, by saying

 

“You are my friends. Love one another as I have loved you.”

 

Jesus’ life so moved the Apostle Paul, that he migrated from being a rule-giver, all about religious correctness, and even killing those who did not follow rightly to saying this, “The only thing that matters is faith expressing itself in love” (which happened to be our text from last week).   

 

We must remember that Jesus and Paul were both good Jews – they would have known the centrality of love from early on.  This was the major theme of the Great Shema of the Jewish faith from Deuteronomy 6:4-8, which reads:

 

4 Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one. 5 Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength. 6 These commandments that I give you today are to be on your hearts. 7 Impress them on your children. Talk about them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you lie down and when you get up.

 

It all began in love and Jesus went even further with this …by quoting and then adding on to the Great Shema (something that would have received the attention of every Jew.) Jesus said, Yes, love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, and strength, but there is a second as equally important, love your neighbor as yourself. 

 

So, what does this mean for First Friends and Quakerdom in general.  I think this is where Brian McLaren is speaking to our condition.  Brian says that what needs to happen is that churches/meetings “need to become ‘schools’ or ‘studios’ of love” teaching people to live a life of love, from the heart, for God, for all people (no exceptions), and for all creation.”

 

I think our own Friends Committee on National Legislation identified their own migration to these thoughts, when they went from bumper stickers that read “War is Not the Answer” to “Love Thy Neighbor (No Exceptions).” 

 

Brian McLaren had me imagining what it might be like if all the churches and meetings here in Indianapolis decided to take people at every age and ability level and help them become the most loving version of themselves possible. Now, that is a beautiful thought.

 

I have a feeling the “Church” might be more effective at helping people face the challenges of life – challenges that normally would make them bitter, self-absorbed, callous, or hateful, and instead help them to be more open, courageous, loving, and generous. People may even begin to recognize where they are straying from the way of love and help people get back on the path. Too often, I sense we don’t believe our actions, our love, can change our environment or the greater world, so we have given up.

 

Yet, just think about that for a moment.  One of the greatest fears people have in our world today is not being loved – not being loved by parents, children, spouses, friends, co-workers, even churches.

 

I was reading an article on the Luis Huete website this week about someone most of us know, who could be the spokesman for those fearing not being loved. That person is Michael Scott on the T.V. show The Office. The article said that Michael Scott (played by Steve Carell) is a clear example of someone who fears not being loved and the consequences of being ruled by this fear. Whenever Michael gets involved, things almost always get botched up. It’s not because he lacks intelligence, but rather it is because he endlessly yearns to be the one who saves the day, or comforts someone, or has the funniest one-liner… because he wants to be the “World’s Best Boss” (as the mug on his desk exclaims) and the way he has achieved that is by making himself “necessary” to others.

 

I think the world is filled with Michael Scotts – the reason we love The Office is because deep down we all can relate – we all fear deep down not being loved. Many in our world are longing, searching, and hungering for someone to love them for who they are. But, what if the church made it a priority to address that fear of not being loved?

 

Brian McLaren says it this way…

 

“Imagine what would happen if for the next five hundred years, our churches put as much energy into the formation of generous Christlike disciples as we have put into getting people to believe certain things or show up at certain buildings or observe certain taboos or support certain political or economic ideologies or keep certain buildings open and people gainfully employed.  Imagine how differently love-motivated teachers and engineers would teach and design; how differently love-directed lawyers and doctors would seek justice and promote well-being, how differently love-driven businesspeople would hire, fire, budget, and negotiate; how differently love-guided voters would vote; and how differently love-guided scholars would relate to students and their subjects. Imagine!

 

My hope is that we will begin moving from just imagining this to living it out. Here at First Friends, I believe we are already on this path and doing many things to help produce love-motivated, love-directed, love-driven, love-guided people.  Actually, in the “The Great Spiritual Migration” Brian McLaren shares a description of a church trying to live this way. As I read the description, I thought it so easily could describe us at First Friends.  It reads,

 

It’s probably important to start making it clear that we’re not the ones who “finally got the Bible right.” Neither do we possess the secret to life, exclusive access to God or “Seven Steps to Satisfaction.” We are, however, powerfully draw to the person of Jesus, his teachings, and even more so, his life.  So we are experimenting, and failing, and building a community that collectively follows his Way; hoping, trusting, and even doubting that it might seed something beautiful in the world. Namely; full and abundant life for all creation.  We think the TRUTH about LIFE may just be LOVE and LOVE may just be the WAY.

 

That describes First Friends rather well!

 

Well, as I conclude this morning, I return to the fact that it is World Quaker Day. This is actually only the 6th annual World Quaker Day put on by Friends World Committee on Consultation.  As I was looking at the materials and theme I noticed the first line of FWCC’s mission which reads,  

 

“Answering God’s call to universal love….”

 

How appropriate to what we are talking about. 

 

As well, FWCC’s theme for World Quaker Day is Sustainability: Planting seeds of renewal for the world we love.  This is a good reminder that this way of love we are talking about includes a love for our earth as well.  Not only are we learning to love our neighbors and ourselves but the earth that is our home.  In The Brother’s Karamazov, Dostoevsky captures this universal love for all of creation – may it be our sending thoughts this morning.   

 

“Love all of God’s creation, both the whole of it and every grain of sand. Love every leaf, every ray of God’s Light. Love Animals, love plants, love each thing.  If you love each thing, you will perceive the mystery of God in things.  Once you have perceived it, you will begin tirelessly to perceive more and more of it every day.  And you will come at last to love the whole would with entire, universal love.” 

 

May this be so! 

 

As we enter into Waiting Worship, I would like to read the queries for us to ponder and for those listening online. 

  • Do we know that we are loved?  Who is letting us know? 

  • In what ways are we discriminatory with our love? 

  • Where do I sense fear in not being loved? 

  • In what ways does/should First Friends produce love-motivated, love-directed, love-driven, and love guided Friends?   

Comment

Comment

9-29-19 - Is This a Way of Life?

Is This A Way of Life?

Indianapolis First Friends Quaker Meeting

Pastor Bob Henry

September 29, 2019

 

Galatians 5:4-6 (NRSV)

 

4 You who want to be justified by the law have cut yourselves off from Christ; you have fallen away from grace. 5 For through the Spirit, by faith, we eagerly wait for the hope of righteousness. 6 For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision counts for anything; the only thing that counts is faith working through love.

 

 

For the first couple weeks of this series, I have focused on beliefs systems and the challenges they pose to Quakerism and Christianity. In many ways, rigid systems of belief that demand correctness have as Brian McLaren points out, caused Christianity (and I believe certain groups of Quakers) to become frozen (I have even heard some people joke about the church becoming the “The Frozen Chosen”).  Brian goes on to say that Christianity has rendered…  

 

“…itself incapable of making ongoing contributions to human cultural evolution as conditions changed. In fact, it became the opposite of what it had originally been: it became a leash or a locked door impeding ongoing growth instead of a force for liberation and forward movement.” 

 

Sadly, I have heard almost these same words describing Quakers or even our Yearly Meeting. We often talk about the Quaker’s great contributions to human cultural evolution, about the forces of liberation and change, yet many of our Quaker contributions happened a long time ago. It makes me ask…

 

·        Have we lost or maybe forgotten our passions and distinctives? 

·        Have we become comfortable or aligned with other faith priorities? 

·        Have we made our Faith and Practice into doctrinal absolutes, hoops to jump through, and systems to gate keep – freezing our own work until everyone gets in line with us? (which let’s be honest, we know is never going to happen).    

 

Folks, we are Quakers/Friends, we are historically known as movers and shakers, even radicals within human history – and not in little ways but big ways – such as women’s suffrage, prison reform, Native American relations, Civil Rights, war relief, and I could go on an on.  Many of these life-giving developments started as grass roots movements in the hearts of individuals within local meetings just like ours – and many of these individuals were young people.  Their discernments and leadings were supported by their local meeting which furthered their cause –sometimes taking it as far as a national and global audience.

  

Just a couple of weeks ago, I was sent some queries to ponder from a small segment of people here at First Friends. They were creating queries to help those in our Meeting with Introspection Regarding Contentious Issues. Just listen to some of the queries they came up with: 

 

·        How do my present values and my meeting’s values reflect upon Quaker values and history?

·        How do the meeting’s current leadings reflect on Christ’s teachings?

·        How may I begin dialogue to gain clarity on said positions or topics?

·        How may I better discern my own inner voice and draw from Christ’s teachings?

·        If I do not see room for dialogue within others or within myself regarding beliefs or concerns; or do not feel safe creating dialogue, how may I create a forum for such within my meeting or myself?

 

First, I love that people are sensing a leading to write queries within our meeting, wanting to have conversations, and to dialogue about contentious issues in our community and world that reflect the life and values of the Jesus we see within the scriptures. I believe this is how grass roots movements begin, change happens, and Quakerism flourishes – this is an exciting prospect for First Friends!  

 

Second, this isn’t the only case of this at First Friends. I have watched, in the last two years, numerous concerns regarding contentious issues come from individuals, be presented to the meeting, and move to bigger arenas where a greater impact can occur – everything from fighting pay-day lending in our city, to addressing women’s education in Africa, to looking closer at the safety of 5G networks.  This is why partnership with Quaker organizations such as Indiana Friends Committee on Legislation, Friends Committee on National Legislation, American Friends Service Committee, Right Sharing of World Resources, Friends World Committee for Consultation, Quaker Voluntary Service, and many more are so vitally important.  All of these organizations utilize and have been started by individuals from the local level that have sensed a call to have a greater impact in our world.  

 

I think this speaks clearly to why Quakers need to continue asking, or for some to return to asking, at the local level; What role do we play? and What can we do, or should we be doing? All while taking time to reflect on where we have grown frozen or ineffective.  Just maybe we need to give ourselves permission to lay down ineffective programs and begin to implement new and more relevant ones that speak to today’s issues.  Just because we have always done something, doesn’t mean it should continue.  It may actually be in the way of new possibilities and allowing new voices within Quakerdom and our own meeting to be heard.    

 

I have to admit, when I look outside of First Friends at Quakers as a whole there is a wealth of possibility. Yet instead of passion, grass roots ideas, and forward movement, I too often see a lot of frozen, leashed, and locked doors – where membership is rapidly declining and the threat of being laid down is knocking at the door. It seems they have lost the momentum, the passion, the force for change, and too often they have lost faith in it changing!  Please hear me on this – I do not want, nor see, this to be our path at First Friends.   

 

I have a feeling many are on this lackluster path because of what Brian McLaren claims,

 

They couldn’t handle the call to faith expressing itself in love,

so, they reverted to beliefs expressing themselves in exclusion instead.

 

The reality is that it is much harder to love people than it is to exclude them. Over the last several years, First Friends has realized this in its migration on marriage equality and same-sex relationships, and I am sure if we went back a few more decades, we would find First Friends had to migrate on its position regarding the acceptance of divorced and remarried people, as well. Many of you in this room at different times of our history would have been excluded by our system of beliefs. These are never easy decisions, but when people are loved and not excluded it is for our betterment and it strengthens our community (unless our safety is at risk).  It’s much easier to use a belief system, or for us a Faith and Practice to promote exclusion.  That is why we need to constantly return to question, re-examine, and rethink our Faith and Practice – embracing its fluidity, relevance, ability to adapt, guide, and change.

 

Some of you may be unaware of the origins of our Quaker “Faith and Practice.” Originally, in the 17th century as the first Faith and Practices where being written down, they were known to document what acceptable Quaker behavior was, Quaker business practice, and Quaker peculiarities (or what we would today call our distinctives and testimonies for living the faith).

 

In the 1900’s when the Orthodox movement of Quakers began to align themselves in America with American Evangelical Protestantism, they added to their faith and practice a set of beliefs that one is to personally accept and believe about God, Jesus, the Church to be considered a true Friend. This is very similar to the statements of faith we see in many churches today.

 

Other Friends (especially those coming out of the Hicksite movement) were very skeptical of anyone telling them exactly what they were to believe. Instead, they often included a collection of excerpts and quotes from Quaker writings on a variety of topics and issues - allowing for individuals to find what speaks most true to their experience. 

 

I personally believe the marriage of American Evangelical Protestantism and Quakerism led many away from their Quaker foundations and caused them to fashion their Faith and Practice into a set of rules and standards instead of a guide for a way of life. 

 

In the beginning of our own Western Yearly Meeting’s Faith and Practice, it quotes the earliest Quaker advice on Faith and Practice from 1656 and describes the spirit that should characterize any such document among Quakers.  It reads,

 

“Dearly beloved friends, these things we do not lay upon you as a rule or form to walk by, but that all with the measure of light which is pure and holy may be guided, and so in the light walking and abiding these may be fulfilled in the spirit, not from the letter; for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.”         

 

Thus, our very earliest Faith and Practice as a unified group of Quakers warned of the dangers that Brian McLaren and many others are talking about today with rigid system of beliefs that “killeth” instead of birthing a life of love.  

 

I am proud of our Quaker ancestors for recognizing the importance early on of not getting caught up in rules or forms and instead embracing a way that brings about life.  And as I have been saying since the beginning of this series, that way of life is rooted in love and modeled in the life of Jesus!

 

Actually, our faith and practice affirms just that, it states

 

“From the birth of the Quaker Movement, Friends have regarded Christianity as essentially an experience and a way of life based on that experience.”

 

It reminds me of when I first read Rob Bell’s book, “Velvet Elvis.”  I hadn’t begun my migration to the Quaker Way (or maybe I had and didn’t know it).  At the time, I was still an Anglican Priest serving a small parish in Michigan, yet something was going on inside me. All the structures, all the rules, all the formalities of my religion were weighing heavily on me, and sadly our denominational structure was crumbling over everything from scandal, to proper ecclesiology, to doctrinal absolutes.  But then I read the following words from Rob Bell and it caused wings to sprout and migration to begin. I believe today, looking back, it was the gateway to my seeking and wanting to live the Quaker way. Rob said speaking of his own experience, 

 

…I am simply trying to orient myself around living a particular kind of way, the kind of way that Jesus taught is possible.  And I think that the way of Jesus is the best possible way to live. This isn’t irrational or primitive blind faith. It is merely being honest that we all are living a “way.”

 

I’m convinced being generous is a better way to live.

I’m convinced forgiving people and not carrying around bitterness is a better way to live.

I’m convinced having compassion is a better way to live.

I’m convinced pursuing peace in every situation is a better way to live.

I’m convinced listening to wisdom of others is a better way to live.

I’m convinced being honest with people is a better way to live

 

[At the time, I had not been introduced to the Quaker S.P.I.C.E.S (Simplicity, Peace, Integrity, Community, Equality, Stewardship) but later I would realize that what Rob was describing were elements of those S.P.I.C.E.S.] 

 

Rob went on to say…

 

Over time when you purposefully try to live the way of Jesus, you start noticing something deeper going on. You begin realizing the reason this is the best way to live is that it is rooted in profound truths about how the world is. You find yourself living more and more in tune with ultimate reality. You are more and more in sync with how the universe is at its deepest levels. 

 

For too long, I had thought the way of Jesus was about having the correct beliefs, following rules and doctrines (because that had been how it was presented to me) – but it was about so much more. I realized I was missing out!

 

This way and life were about reality and living in the present moment and allowing the Truths of my faith to surface as I lived my life together with others in community.  I, and many others like me, assumed the comfort and isolation of religion kept us safe in almost a magic bubble, safe from the wild-ness of the world.

 

Where it began to come into perspective was when I started to see this way rooted in the most profound truth - love.  This was what Brian McLaren described as Jesus’ “unflinching emphasis” and his most radical point. Brian said,

 

“It was his new commandment, his prime directive – love for God, for self, for neighbor, for stranger, for alien, for outsider, for outcast, and even for enemy, as he himself modeled. 

 

I realized that this way – this living a life of love meant that I would need to get out of my bubble. That my structures, my beliefs, the things that I had thought mattered the most, would need to take a backseat to learning to love.  Jesus himself would take the 10 rules (or commandments) from the Old Testament and sum them up in two statements of love – Love God and Love your neighbors as yourself. 

 

If you noticed our scripture for today said it so well,

 

For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision counts for anything [symbols of the rules and regulations of the pharisees]; the only thing that counts is faith working through love.

 

Next Sunday, as we celebrate World Quaker Day, we will explore more deeply what it looks like “When Love is the Way.”

 

As we head into waiting worship this morning, I want to read the queries for us to ponder and for those listening online: Ask yourself…

 

·        Where am I being called to speak up and share my passions for service in the meeting, the community, or world?

·        Where have I found it easier to exclude than to live out of love?

·        What religious bubbles might I need to pop to experience a fuller life?

Comment

Comment

9-22-19 - What about Belief Systems?

What about Belief Systems?

Indianapolis First Friends Quaker Meeting

Pastor Bob Henry

September 22, 2019

 

1 John 4:7-8, 12

7 Beloved, let us love one another, because love is from God; everyone who loves is born of God and knows God. 8 Whoever does not love does not know God, for God is love.

12 No one has ever seen God; if we love one another, God lives in us, and his love is perfected in us.

 

 

Last week I started this sermon series by asking, “Can Quakerism be Saved?” and I emphatically proclaimed that not only should it be saved, but that it has a vital and distinctive roll in our world today.  I also talked about how Christians and Quakers have too often bought into a system of beliefs that is grounded in fear of not being right or having all the answers. 

 

This morning, I want to explore further how that need to have “correct beliefs” has led many people (including myself) away from looking for and continuing to explore the deeper meaning that guides us. Leading us too often to point fingers, hunker down, and build walls instead of living out a life of love, grace, and peace. 

 

Let’s begin with something from Brian McLaren in his book, The Great Spiritual Migration. He says that for many Christians (and I would include a great deal of Quaker Christians as well) only one thing really matters and that is having correct beliefs.  He goes on to say,

 

“Based on the priorities of many Christian leaders and institutions, we might conclude that Jesus said, “By their beliefs you shall know them,” or “This is my command, that you believe the right doctrines,” or “Behold, a new systematic theology I give you.”

 

Or that Paul said, “Though I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not the right theory of atonement, I am a noisy gong or clanging cymbal.”

 

Or that James said, “True religion is this: to have the right concept of spiritual authority.”

Or that John said, “God is a doctrine, and those who have the correct beliefs know God and abide in God.”

 

In spite of the fact that no such statements can be found in the Scriptures, you can take this to the bank: when it comes to Christianity in many of its forms, have the right beliefs and you are in. Orthodox. Certified. Bona fide. Legit.

 

But as important as beliefs are, they are not the essential, unchanging, defining feature of Christianity.”

 

I cannot count the times as a pastor I have been asked, “What is the correct belief about this or that?” or “What does the Bible, as the final authority, say is the right belief?”  or “I am pretty sure you are wrong, because I was taught…?”

 

We have a hunger for being right, don’t we, especially as it pertains to God and the Bible. And yet, understanding God and the bible are so much more complicated than we know or understand. Most of the time my answers today are more in lines with, “What has been your experience? or “Here is what I have learned about God and the Bible over time, but I may be wrong?” always allowing opportunity for us together to explore and seek that of God within one another. 

 

Sadly, those adaptions of scriptures from Brian McLaren I read are too often reality for many people of faith and churches out there. Instead of bringing hope and possibility for life as we know it, they are allowing their belief systems to become judgmental, guilt-producing, and creating an heir of superiority among their faith communities.

 

Actually, entire doctrines, statements of belief, and theologies have been created because “correctness” at some point began to replace faith. And in just saying that, there is irony. Correctness is as the dictionary puts it – “the quality or state of being free from error.” But faith, as the bible says, is “the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen.”  There is quite a difference in these views, one creates absolutes and determined outcomes, while the other opens a door for possibility and ongoing revelation.   

 

Even the Jesus we encounter in the Gospels wasn’t all about right words or correct beliefs. Often he challenged what they believed, answered with questions, and even broaden the beliefs (to be more inclusive and understanding). The Bible shows that Jesus was interested in what we do, the fruit we bear, the houses we build on firm foundations, the way we work for the will of God. Jesus was a picture of what our scriptures said last week, what we were to keep at work for - this faith and love.  When we take a closer look at the actual scriptures which Brian McLaren reworded, you will see how instead of system of beliefs Jesus was emphasizing a way of life rooted in LOVE.  Just listen to them again as they appear in the Bible.  

 

·        “By their fruit you will recognize them.” Matt. 7:16

·        “My command is this: Love each other as I have loved you.” John 15:12

·        “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” John 13:34-35.

·        “If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but do not have love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal.” I Corinthians 13:1-3

·        “Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world.” James 1:27

·        “Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love.” I John 4:8

     

There is a lot of love going on there…and not much correctness of beliefs.  

Most of us entered or awoke into organized religion at some point in our life – if that is not your story, then be thankful for your journey.  For many of us, somewhere early on in that process we were taught things that shaped our system of beliefs. Don’t get me wrong, some things were good foundations and helped us continue to grow and learn, while other things were confusing and even caused Dark Nights of the soul or crisis of faith as we explored.

 

From as far back as I can remember, I was taught, and even taught my own kids, the bedtime prayer…

 

Now I lay me down to sleep.

I pray the Lord my soul to keep. 

If I should die before I wake.

I pray the Lord my soul to take. Amen.

 

Along with this kind of haunting prayer, I was reminded each year that I was baptized to keep me out of the fires of hell and safe as a child of God.

 

Around second grade, I remember a conversation with my mom that became so engrained in my mind that I still today remember exactly where I was when it happened.  We were looking at the beautiful clouds over Fort Myers Beach, Florida on vacation, when my mom mentioned that she could not wait to see Jesus coming on a white horse through those clouds someday. A beautiful thought, but also a bit worrisome as I continued to read more about what this would entail – everything from separating sheep from goats, escaping or rapturing from an earth that was already going to hell in a handbasket, judgement, swords, blood, and an assortment of other theories about end times.

 

I thought each of these experiences were about growing my faith (and in some ways they were), but instead I sense now that they were actually creating for me a system of beliefs – a structure – a container to fit my religion, my faith, and too often even my god. And like I said last week, this would have some unintended consequences…such as…my understanding of a violent and wrathful God that wanted to punish sinners, a God that would judge us ultimately by what we believed – even if we didn’t act on it,  and that there were right and wrong beliefs that had different consequences.

 

But then in 1988 as I was wrestling with the barrage of constant news and vitriol around the Aids epidemic and Ryan White (who was just a year older than me), a made for T.V. movie by the name of “Go Toward the Light” aired in primetime. (On a side note I think that title is rather fitting for someone who later become a convinced Quaker.) The evening it aired, I had finishing my homework and had decided to hang out in our basement and watch some TV alone. 

 

If you remember, last week I mentioned that the whirlwind around Ryan White caused my first Dark Night of the Soul (or what some might call a crisis of faith), but looking back I am pretty sure it was intensified by this movie. 

 

Before Linda Hamilton really made it big as a lead in Terminator 2, and after Richard Thomas (who we all knew as John Boy) finished up The Walton’s and found his new gig as the lead in a plethora of made-for-tv movies, they took on the role of playing a young couple facing the realities of life with a child diagnosed with Aids – I am assuming based loosely on the life experiences of Ryan White.  I can still sense the feelings I had watching that movie. Up until that night, I don’t remember ever crying during a movie. Here I was a 15-year-old bawling my eyes out, my body shaking violently as I wept.  I felt angry.  I felt confused.  I felt doubt.  My system of beliefs had no way to help me process or even explain what I was being asked to face and wrestle with within this movie. 

 

Here was a fictious child in a movie dying of aids. Fictious parents struggling with what to do. Yet the biggest problem I faced was not dying or suffering – there was something more.  This child and his family were portrayed as being Mormon. 

 

Now, it was hard enough to watch and try and understand the Christian Church’s response to Ryan White, but adding this Mormon twist changed things enough that I theologically went into a tailspin. Here were some of the thoughts whirling through my head…

 

·        Mormons aren’t saved.

·        This kid wasn’t baptized, and after losing the battle to Aids went straight to hell.

·        Did he or his family deserve this punishment – did he get Aids because he did not believe correctly?

·        How unfair that this boy was raised in a Mormon home? Did he ever have a chance to know the truth of Jesus? Boy, am I glad I was raised in a Christian home.  

·        Could Jesus still save him?

·        If God was about forgiveness and love – why did this seem so cruel.

 

After trying to pull it together at the conclusion of the movie, I came upstairs and started a conversation with my mother.  She had to have seen that I was crying just by looking at my face.  She asked if I was ok, and then she got a full-on regurgitation of everything I was struggling with… Thankfully, my mom didn’t try to answer my questions, she admitted this was hard and simply comforted me – I cried more.  And then she asked if it would help if we talked to one of our pastors. I remember having her write down some of the things I was wrestling with to ask our pastor, but thinking back to his response it seems even more confusing. 

 

He said something like this: This is a difficult subject. Yes, what you witnessed is confusing and sometimes doesn’t fit our categories.  He went on to explain how loving and gracious God is and that he was sure that there were times when God saved people because of his grace.  This boy would probably be one of those examples. It is hard, because we don’t know what God knows.

 

For months – even years – this all would haunt me.  And honestly, even though I have grown, become more educated, and more developed in my understanding of faith…I still struggle with these thoughts.  What I do know is that at that time, my faith was based on a system of beliefs, specific theologies and dogmas about God that for the first time did not have nice and neat categories. 

 

And folks, I want to be totally honest, if you didn’t notice, I am a pastor…my vocation is all about belief systems and how people hold the “right beliefs,” organize them in the “right systems,” and pass those systems onto the next generation.  But like that night in my basement, I continue to encounter problems and questions with my beliefs.  To be honest, overtime some of my beliefs I have had to migrate from and some I have had to migrate toward. 

 

There have been times when I have thought, “It is not safe for me to say what I actually believe – especially as a pastor.”  Yet looking back, I often did that out of comfort, lack of courage or understanding, or simply to try and protect my family and myself.  Many of you have shared similar stories with me, where stating what you believe or didn’t believe has cost you relationships, friendships, and even jobs.       

 

Often one of the unintended consequences of a rigid system of beliefs is a false sense of belonging.  We are accepted for what we believe or profess to be true, instead of who we are with all our questions, wondering, and baggage.  Personally, I think this is what keeps people coming to many churches – especially mega-churches – with little commitment or spiritual growth – just a common set of beliefs (which often not everyone agrees with but acts as if they do – most of the time because they have never been allowed to question, explore, or doubt).         

 

Brian McLaren takes this further and says our system of beliefs have too often become “primary markers for belonging, allowing religious gatekeepers to gain an almost” “superpower” in our world – a power to excommunicate or expel those that do not follow the same system of beliefs. Throughout its history, the Church has spent so much time testing compliance that we too often have completely forgot about loving and forgiving, and even caring.  As long as you have the correct answers, vote for the same party, hold the same sexual orientation  – you are in and accepted – but question or step out of line and you are backsliding, unhealthy, unworthy, and need to be excluded from the ranks.  Folks, that is what describes a cult not a life of faith in love.       

 

For years, I literally spent hours debating with people about their views of God, the church, and especially the Bible – simply to help me judge if they were “in or out,” “right or wrong,” or “saved or unsaved.”  And I thought my job in ministry was, that if I believed them to be wrong, then I needed to prove them wrong, or impose my right system of beliefs on them.  Seldom, did I take the time to get to know the person, to acknowledge their journey, to pause and work to see that of God in them.  I and my church simply wanted compliance and correctness. There were times when I wondered if my denomination or tribe was going to end up being the only people in heaven – that I would later learn is called denominational supremacy.

 

At First Friends and among Quakerdom, my hope is that we are providing spaces for people with questions. Space for people wondering and wandering. Space for people with spiritual baggage, people who have lost faith, and people who are simply needing love, encouragement, or a fellow journeyer to travel with.  My hope is that at First Friends ALL people would find a place of open doors, possibilities, and opportunities for further exploration. 

 

I so wish my 15-year-old self would have had First Friends to help dialogue, explore, and be a safe place to question – and ultimately even migrate. I might have found a different Jesus, a different God, a different way of expressing my faith 30+ years ago.  And I might not have had so much fear of getting it wrong or that God was going to punish me if I did. Instead, I may have been able to shift from that rigid system of beliefs to a way of life that was based on love as I see it today. Freer to explore and experience God in new and life-giving ways.  

 

We at First Friends have such an important ministry to offer here in Indianapolis with so many people becoming dismayed by the church, the bible and God. We have an alternative to offer – not another system of beliefs to adhere to, but rather a way of life to live together.  Yes, it has values and beliefs (we may just call them S.P.I.C.E.S. or testimonies), and yes, it is clearly centered on the life and ministry of Jesus, but most importantly it is a place where belonging is not about gatekeeping and correctness – instead to belong means you are part of a way of life rooted in love and supported together!

 

At the close of Phil Gulley’s book, “Living the Quaker Way,” he provides what he titles, “A Quaker Way Altar Call.” I love that he uses that terminology, because it is a more tangible way of seeing the shift or migration we are called to make as Quakers to this way of life together.  Phil says,

 

In times of moral confusion, living the Quaker way has provided clarity and direction.

When I have been tempted to believe material gain will bring me joy, its clarion call for simple and centered living has cheered my heart.

When I have thought violence and war appropriate solutions to evil and injustice, the Quaker way has reminded me of the power of love and reconciliation.

When I have played fast and loose with the truth, it has taught me to walk the straight line.

When I have been selfish, it has made the joys of community all the more real to me and saved me from self-absorption.

When I have treated some people as lesser, the Quaker way has reminded me of the deep esteem in which God holds all people and has empowered me to work for the good of everyone.

It has reminded me that God speaks to all and through all.

It has taught me to listen more, speak less, and seek the happiness and well-being of others insofar as I am able.

Living the Quaker way has, in every sense, made my life a deep and present joy.

I believe it can do the same for you.  For I believe you and I are not all that different, that we struggle with the same problems and challenges common to all. Whether you formally join a Quaker community is secondary to me, as it would be to any other Quaker. It is your embodiment of these ideas that I encourage, for the good of your life, for the good of your soul, for the good of this world. With those hopes in mind, I invite you to walk and to live this Quaker way. 

 

So let’s get moving or maybe I should say – let’s get living the Quaker Way! 

 

Queries to ponder:

 

·        What “beliefs” about God, the Bible, the church, do you struggle with?

·        Why is it so hard to move from correct beliefs to a life of love?

·        At First Friends, how can we continue to create spaces for exploration, question, and doubt? And how are we modeling the Quaker way and life rooted in love?

 

Comment

Comment

9-15-19 - Can Quakerism Be Saved?

Can Quakerism Be Saved?

Indianapolis First Friends Quaker Meeting

Pastor Bob Henry

September 15, 2019

 

2 Timothy 1:13-14 (MSG)

13-14 So keep at your work, this faith and love rooted in Christ, exactly as I set it out for you. It’s as sound as the day you first heard it from me. Guard this precious thing placed in your custody by the Holy Spirit who works in us.

This past summer I had the opportunity to speak at several different Quaker gatherings here in Indiana. From the annual Stoking the Fire event for Friends United Meeting to the Leadership Conference at Earlham School of Religion, each gathering afforded me the opportunity to speak on different subjects to a variety of diverse Quakers. One thing that seemed to be evident and very similar at each gathering was a deep sense of concern for the future of Quakerism. Often, I found myself among people who posed questions like, Can Quakerism be saved? or What hope is there for Quakerism, today?

Something similar also came up at one of the other events I was asked to present at this summer – our own Western Yearly Meeting Sessions in July. I was part of a panel discussion that was tasked with revisiting some of the vision and actions of earlier Friends that might compel us to rekindle some of their love and power for contemporary times. My 20-minute presentation focused on Quaker Civil Rights activists Bayard Rustin and Barrington Dunbar.  

After we all presented, they opened it for general Q&A.  Our own John Moorman asked the panel a more personal question. (Please note: I had to call John this week to try and get the exact question he asked – so here is the best we could come up with.)

What about Quakerism has been important to you and that you                            consider important to its future?

I was glad that a couple of the other presenters had the opportunity to go first, to give me time to think. As I sat looking out as part of the panel from the front of the Plainfield Meetinghouse, I wrestled with just how to answer John’s question. Honestly, there was not enough time to unpack all that I wanted to say.  As the microphone was finally passed to me. I looked up and said,

 

“What has been important to me in Quakerism

is that we don’t have to be right or have all the answers.”

 

Immediately, almost every eye in the room rose to meet mine.  Some seemed shocked while others looked quizzical or maybe even confused.  I quickly knew that what I had said, was already being interpreted, judged and categorized. 

 

A bit hesitantly, I went on to explain how that morning, a picture had shown up on my Facebook feed from a Northwest Yearly Meeting Business Session that I had attended a few years earlier. In the photo were the Clerk, Assistant Clerk, Recording Clerk, and at the time, a youth from my meeting in Silverton who was making a presentation and representing a group of several hundred passionate youth.

 

What I explained in the panel was how each of the people in that photo were Quakers that I admired and looked up to – some of them had even been mentors that had taught me the importance of not having to be right or having all the answers. Please understand – this was all while we were in the midst of some difficult battles in our Yearly Meeting about biblical authority, same-sex relationships, and even atonement theories – fun stuff to say the least, that you must know would ultimately tear us apart.  Through it all, these people had modeled and encouraged Quaker process and discernment, and always led by example in listening to their inner Light for leadings and nudgings. Our clerk alone at the time was able to convey the shear importance of minding the light and waiting on the spirit to give guidance and wisdom, and he was also able to provide a place where an answer or “being right” was not always necessary. 

 

I didn’t go much further in answering John’s question, because I sensed the room uncomfortable and not completely buying what I was saying. Over the years, I have learned that not having the answers or not being right is often too scary for many people, especially those who have been taught to rely or lean on belief systems, dogmas, and certain theologies – allowing the systems to almost believe for them instead of exploring or seeking for themselves. So, I passed the microphone on. 

 

As I have had time to process my experiences this summer and think more about the answer to John’s impromptu question, I have continued to return to the words I said that day in hopes of expanding the ideas. As a pastor who is often  sought out for the right answer, I continue to see the freedom and possibilities of not having to be right or to have the answers - especially as it pertains to one’s spiritual growth and opportunities for diverse and rich communities of dialogue and relationship. As I have been processing this, I also returned for another look at Brian McLaren’s book, The Great Spiritual Migration, which has offered me more details and ways to help explain my thoughts further – thus our Fall Sermon Series which I begin today.  [Pause]

 

Now folks, I am going to be totally honest, I believe Quakerism is more relevant today, than ever in history. This almost seems ironic to proclaim as we continue to hear of meetings being laid down by the dozens, yearly meetings splitting and suffering to survive, and division proliferating among Quakers.   

 

But let’s be honest, most of that division stems from two things: needing to be right and having the answers.

 

Brian McLaren sheds some light on this.  He says,

 

“For centuries, Christianity has been presented as a system of beliefs.”

 

I must say this has been true for Quakers at certain times as well. When I taught our Youth Affirmation Class, I brought with me several different Faith and Practices from around Quakerdon to peruse. There were some similarities, but a great deal of differences. Sadly, what we have labeled as our Faith and Practice has often become a stagnant and rigid system or statements or beliefs from a specific era and theological perspective rather than a fluid document that guides the understanding of our faith and practice and offers an openness to question and even makes changes over time. One of the things that convinced me to be a Quaker was that fluidity, that openness and that opportunity for change.

 

Brian goes on to be extremely honest about the outcomes and tragedies that have occurred because people have become comfortable and unmovable around their system of beliefs, he says that our systems of belief have

“…supported a wide range of unintended consequences, from colonialism to environmental destruction, subordination of women to stigmatization of LGBTQ people, anti-Semitism to Islamophobia, clergy pedophilia to white privilege.”

 

Now, some of these unintended consequences are evident in Quakerism as I speak, and many are even the cause of much of the suffering and division amongst us.  If we were fully honest, we might even find some of these unintended consequences within these very walls.  

 

Prior to coming to Indianapolis, I was on the front lines of some of those unintended consequences out in the Northwest. I saw lines being drawn and the following of specific beliefs alienating and even harming individuals and groups of people – especially people who refused to fall in-line or find themselves on the “correct” side. Acutally, even my own family and I were alienated and harmed by these consequences.  

 

Exploration, questioning, and discernment was stifled and sorely missing. Conversations, debates, and even biblical exegesis was replaced with doctrinal absolutes and finalities about what should be understood or considered if one was a true Christian or their brand of Quaker. This was not the Quakerism or Christianity that had convinced me. In reality, all of this became so ugly, that I didn’t even know if I wanted to be associated with Jesus or Christianity or anything that smelled of religion. Being spiritual but not religious, like a growing part of our world, was starting to appeal to me – simply because I was becoming appalled and embarrassed by those who proclaimed they were Christian and followed Jesus by allowing their systems of belief to judge, exclude, and hurt their neighbors.

 

But that was just it, I was (and am) a Quaker. This was not what my Quaker history taught or what I had come to be convinced of. I started to ask some deeper questions: Wasn’t it George Fox who reacted to the formalism and traditionalism of the established church in his day? Didn’t he place what he considered the God-given inward light above creeds and scriptures and regarded personal experience as the true source of authority?  And rather than a religion, weren’t we part of a Society of Friends who was to present the world with a new, even radical, way of living based on values like simplicity, peace, integrity, community and equality?  Values that were modeled and exemplified in the life and ministry of Jesus.  Fellow Quaker minister Phil Gulley would write an entire book about living this Quaker Way just a few years after I began to ask these questions. I highly recommend his book, and yes, it is in our meeting’s library. 

 

What I was coming to realize was that Quakerism wasn’t about a set of steps to follow, dogmas to believe, rules to enforce, or hoops to jump through – but rather it was about a way of life among community, where our guiding center was our Inner Light or what early Quakers considered the Present Christ or presence of the Spirit.

 

Brian McLaren also challenged me to consider a similar shift in our faith communities today, he asked…

 

“What would it mean for Christians to rediscover their faith not as a problematic system of beliefs, but as a just and generous way of life, rooted in contemplation and expressed in compassion, that makes amends for its mistakes and is dedicated to beloved community for all? Could Christians migrate from defining their faith as a system of beliefs to expressing it as a loving way of life?”

 

In many ways, what he is describing is a return to Quakerism at its purest, and I believe he is getting to exactly what could actually save Quakerism. We need to rediscover our faith as a way of life again. We need, in Brian’s words, to migrate again. Remember, Quakers have been migrating from their inception. George Fox, himself, was one who migrated from the Anglican and Puritan faiths because of their controlling system of beliefs to centering on one’s Inner Light and way of life modeled by Jesus.

 

I can relate to these migratory patterns.

 

I think one of my first attempts at migrating came when I was a freshman in college. I had grown up being taught in the church that women had no place in church leadership. I soon found myself stepping out and questioning that during a small group session at my freshman initiation. Please note, my undergraduate school was a product of my church denomination who held this same belief about women. I remember the young ladies in my small group ridiculing me for being wrong and saying it was an honor to be submissive to a man God had put over her. It took several more years before I finally was able to fully migrate on this issue and come to a more egalitarian position.     

 

Another happened on my internship at a church in Oviedo, Florida, where one Sunday, a man who was suffering from Aids showed up for Sunday worship.  Again, I was taught in many of my religious circles growing up that Aids was the “gay plague” and God’s retribution for homosexual sin. I watched as my senior pastor avoided the man on Sunday morning and then literally left out the back door of the office before the man came to a scheduled meeting with the pastor during the week.  Once the man gave up waiting and exited the parking lot, the pastor quickly appeared again to vigorously scrub down every chair and doorknob in our office the man may have touched – all out of fear of getting Aids.  As an intern, I was shocked and confused but it stuck with me…This was not how Jesus approached the lepers or others with diseases in the bible? Sadly, the pastor’s response to that man with Aids would be how the majority of churches out there would respond during the entire Aids epidemic. Just a few years earlier, right here in Indiana, I remember struggling with the response of the church to Ryan White.  It had such a great impact on me, I later wrote about it being my first dark night of the soul. Too often the well-meaning church has stood firm on their condemning belief system rather than on expressing a loving way of life that would embrace or help the vulnerable.

 

‘These are just a couple examples, but I have continued to migrate over the years…

 

  • From liturgical and over-programmed worship to Quaker semi and unprogrammed worship

  • From a wrathful and punishing God to a non-violent peace-loving God

  • From exclusion of the LGBTQ community to acceptance and affirmation  

  • From biblical literalism to seeing poetry, allegory, and context

  • From fear to love

  • And so many more…some that I will share as we continue this series.

 

And in these times of questions, exploration, and migration, I have often had what Brian McLaren refers to as my “inner fundamentalist” appear and speak into my ear (kind of like the cartoons with the devil and angel – except mine is the voice of my inner-fundamentalist that would often say,

 

“Just a minute! You are not allowed to do that. Christian faith was defined once and for all by Jesus and the apostles. It is encoded in the creeds and preserved by religious leaders and institutions. It’s already fully constructed, and there’s nothing to deconstruct or reconstruct. Our generation’s duty is to hand it down faithfully, without change. Here we stand [something that growing up Lutheran was engrained in me because Luther, himself, would say it in the midst of his own migration from the Catholic faith], without apology, accommodation, or migration. Christianity must always be what it has always been.  Anything else is unorthodox, heretical, apostate, and wrong…

 

But like Brian McLaren, my inner fundamentalist also misled me. He assumed that the faith that was passed down to me from my family and my church was exactly the same treasure given by Jesus and the apostles. Brian points out that, “He didn’t realize how often through history we Christians have tampered with that original gift, how often we’ve weighed it down with baggage or suppressed some parts of it and exaggerated others, how often we’ve said the words but missed the point.”

 

And that takes me back to why I believe Quakerism is so important and needs to be saved.  Quakerism is a treasure and gift for anyone seeking, growing, spiritually forming, questioning, doubting, and yes, most importantly migrating. It offers a space where you don’t have to have the answer or be right, but can simply be a part of a faith journey and exploration with a diversity of others who are journeying toward Truth. 

 

That is what I love about First Friends – I believe we are a picture of a New Kind of Quakerism.  Unlike many other faith communities, we aren’t trying to make cookie-cutter Quakers that all look and act the same.  Nor are we making it about a system of beliefs or theological hoops to jump through. Rather, at First Friends we are simply taking people where they are and giving them tools to seek, grow, form, question, doubt, and migrate to new and exciting possibilities. And we embrace the migrating or those needing to migrate, and heck, I just may encourage a bit of migrating throughout the rest of this sermon series. It’s time to get moving! 

 

As we move into waiting worship, let us take a moment to ponder some queries. 

  • Do you know anyone who has left organized religion or is close to doing so? What has driven them away?  

  • How have belief systems influenced your view of God and neighbor? Have you made any changes over time? 

  • Where have we migrated or where do we need to migrate at First Friends? 

Also, something new for this fall – after Meeting for Worship we are offering a space for those wanting to further explore and discuss the queries and ideas from the sermon. Feel free to grab a cup of coffee and a snack and head into the Seeking Friends room this morning. Please note that those who gather will facilitate the conversation. On non-monthly meeting Sundays we will meet in the parlor. 

 

 

 

Comment

Comment

9-8-19 - Shalom in Unexpected Places

Shalom in Unexpected Places

 

Genesis 33:1-17

 

Beth Henricks – September 8th 2019

 

 

 

I am giving the message on our fall kick off Sunday because I took an intensive class on the Gospel of Peace from Earlham School of Religion in August.  This was an amazing class where we connected with students from Nigeria that have experienced significant violence from the terrorist group Bokam Harem and had a professor from the Theological College of Northern Nigeria as well as a Professor of New Testament studies from our sister seminary, Bethany and   we researched, reviewed and discussed how do we live into the gospel of peace when we live in a world of violence.  I prepared a research paper on the text that Bob read and part of our student experience in this class is to share a message with all of you on this text.  Thank you for being a part of my journey with this Master of Divinity.

 

We Quakers talk about peace quite a bit and usually reference this in terms of the absence of war.  We have a long history of seeking other alternatives to violence and war.  But what does the Bible say about peace?  As we read it cover to cover there is an awful lot of violence in the Scriptures and some of this violence seems to be commanded by God.  Even Jesus says in Matthew10:34  that he doesn’t come to bring peace but the sword.  Is God a God of peace or a God of violence and judgement?  We wrestled with this question throughout the class.  Our different flavors of Christianity have a number of views on this very issue.  I  believe the text that Bob shared with us today offers us a picture into the face of God and a glimpse of understanding into God’s character.

 

One of the things I have learned at seminary  is that we should never take anything at face value, particularly when it comes to reading the Bible.  There are issues of translation (from Hebrew, Greek to English),  the changes that occurred in manually copying the texts again and again over hundreds of years, the context of the environment when the words were written and understanding of what happened before and after each text.

 

The word peace is used in our English Bible but in the Hebrew language the word is shalom.  Most of us have heard this word before – I remember going to the Jon Stewart event in Washington DC in 2010, The Rally to Restore Sanity and I carried  a sign that said Shalom.  I thought I was holding up a sign advocating for peace – the absence of war.  But the meaning of shalom in the Hebrew is much deeper and more holistic then I ever understood. 

 

Shalom means being complete, being whole,  having a non-anxious presence,  a sense of well-being,  harmonious.    It calls us to a wholeness within ourselves.  So much of our violence starts within us and shalom calls us to allow God to bring us into our complete and whole being.  That is where we start. And then shalom takes us into the world and how we can impact the completeness of our family relationships, our neighbors, our communities, our country, and our enemies.

 

I selected Genesis 33:1-17 because this passage shows in a very dramatic way the possibility of shalom between two enemies that are flesh and blood, but also symbolized two nations and their possibility of reconciliation.  I view it as a powerful example of God’s shalom and the potential of bringing enemies together with deep divisions and former hatred.

 

This  text  is  all about transformation and reconciliation.  Both Jacob and Esau experience transformation and because of their vulnerability and openness they experience reconciliation.  While they could not live in the same land together, they maintained a peace between them.  I believe there are several lessons here that can impact us today.

 

This passage is considered a unified plot where the narrative prior to the chosen Scripture is important to the text.  That is why we must begin earlier in Genesis to understand why this reconciliation is so significant in showing the way of peace and shalom to bring wholeness to this relationship and provide an example for all of us in the possibility of shalom.

 

We start our story in Genesis 25.  Many of you will  remember this story.  Jacob and Esau are twins with Esau the first born and Issacs’s favorite son while Jacob, the younger brother was his mother Rebekah’s favorite son.  (Gen 25:24-28)

 

Esau gave up his birthright to Jacob for a pot of stew that he made, and it doesn’t seem like he cares much about what this birthright will mean to him.  Jacob continued in his deceit and trickery when Isaac calls out to Esau to hunt game and prepare a stew so that Isaac would give him his blessing.  Rebekah hears this and tells Jacob to bring her a goat so that she can prepare a stew and Jacob will pretend to be Esau and receive Isaac’s blessing.  They pull off the deception and Isaac gives Jacob the patriarchal blessing.  When Esau discovers this and confronts his father, Isaac stands by his covenant of blessing to Jacob even as this was done in deception to him.  (Genesis 27)

 

Esau was furious and hated his brother for stealing the blessing and was prepared to kill him. (Gene 27:41)  Rebekah hears about this and sends Jacob to her brother’s home for safety (Gen27:42-45).  He stayed there for 20 years and became successful in terms of animals and assets although he experienced great hardship through the trickery of his uncle Laban.  And his mother Rebekah was supposed to tell him when it was safe to return to their homeland.  He never heard from her for over 20 years and became a victim in Laban’s world.  However, Jacob continued with deceit and also tricked Laban to gain his own wealth.   

 

Jacob desired to return to the land of his birth, yet he feared an encounter with Esau even though it’s been 20 years they have been apart.  Esau by now is living in the land of Seir, the country of Edom.  Jacob sent messengers ahead with the promise of gifts to appease Esau.  The messengers returned telling Jacob that Esau is on his way to meet Jacob and his group with four hundred men.  (Genesis 32)   When Jacob sees 400 hundred men coming with Esau, he is frightened and divides into two groups.  He puts the least important individuals at the front and places his beloved Joseph and Rachel in the very back.  He goes ahead of all of them to face his brother.

 

Jacob made the first move in verse 3 by bowing to the ground 7 times until Esau is upon him.  Bowing to the ground would denote honor and respect to Esau and placed Jacob in an inferior position.  I believe  this is when shalom begins between these enemies. 

 

Verse 4 is such a powerful verse of grace, love and forgiveness.  It states, “But Esau ran to meet him, and embraced him and fell on his neck and kissed him, and they wept.”    The running of Esau might have initially frightened Jacob as this could be the start of the attack, but instead there is a kiss, an embrace and tears  that offer reconciliation.    Is this not the expression of God’s love and peace?  Forgiveness of those who have wronged us?

 

Esau is then introduced to Jacob’s wives and children and they all bow down to Esau.  Esau asked for an explanation of all of this and Jacob declared that he wants to find favor with Esau and offers these gifts.  Esau said that he has enough, and that Jacob should keep all of this for himself.  So clearly even without the first-born blessing, Esau has been successful and does not need the offerings from Jacob.  Jacob insisted that Esau accept his gift because he has been blessed and has all that he needs.  Jacob must be feeling guilt knowing how he deceptively received the birthright and the blessing and wants to offer some recompense for his actions.   He might also be looking to  ensure that his stealing of the blessing is negated by acceptance of these gifts and that Esau cannot enact revenge on him in the future.  The scripture indicates that Esau did take and accept the gifts.  It is interesting to note that Esau used the term brother in addressing Jacob while Jacob used the term “My Lord” three times in these verses.  What is Jacob’s intent?  Is it to give honor to Esau to negotiate a treaty between them?  Is Jacob giving back the stolen blessing?  Or is he just afraid of Esau and appeases him with a false sense of honor and positions himself as socially inferior? 

 

Even after this amazing reconciliation, Jacob is still suspicious of Esau’s true intent.  Esau wanted to journey alongside Jacob, but Jacob made up excuses for why this is not possible.  He encouraged Esau to go ahead of him (maybe so there won’t be any blind attack from the rear).  Esau suggested leaving some of his people with Jacob, but Jacob feigns  an objection of why should my lord be so kind to me?   So, Esau returned to Seir and Jacob built a house in Succoth.

 

The very ending of the passage is a bit disappointing from the climactic embrace of the brothers.  Jacob told Esau that he would see him in Seir  (verse 14) but never goes to visit him.   While we see a total transformation in Esau’s heart, we don’t see quite the same transformation of Jacob.  While it appears that Esau has matured into the older son, Jacob is still looking behind his back.   Some biblical scholars say that a reconciliation has not occurred because the two former enemies  will not live together.  Do they in fact have reconciliation?   Can there be reconciliation without community?  Could this be a model of two nations living in peace?   Even with this ending, I would still propose this is a significant event of transformation and reconciliation.  Jacob and Esau moved from hatred and fear to respect and a  willingness to find a way to live peacefully.   Sometimes when we forgive it doesn’t mean that we will be close,  live by each other, forget the offense or be friends.  But what this forgiveness does is bring about shalom within us.

 

In this passage Esau conveyed God’s forgiveness and compassion.  Jacob saw God in Esau’s face because of the acceptance and favor Jacob experienced from Esau.  While the Jacob story line is the one that the Old and New Testament follow, I believe that Esau is essential to God’s narrative and a character in the story that should be honored more than our Christian tradition has conveyed. 

 

This story of Esau and Jacob is referenced in Obadiah (Obadiah 1:1-21) and Malachi  (Malachi 1:2-5)  and seems to interpret this story as “an inscrutable act of divine election”  These two prophets talk about this story in terms of Israel being selected as Yahweh’s chosen without any reason for this.   And view Esau’s descendants as the enemies of Israel.  These scriptures seem to enforce the idea of enemies that are destined to be in conflict because of God’s selection.  Jacob received this blessing even though it is achieved through trickery and deception.  This was ok with God?  That is a hard concept to accept as I have struggled for many years to understand how God selected this group of people to be his “chosen nation” and yet will reject others.   The NIV Student Bible commentary states that “God narrowed his focus to a single person in order to carry out his plan to save the world.  God couldn’t choose everyone – moreover, those individuals God did choose were not always the ones we admire.   I was raised in a fundamentalist tradition that taught me that we are predestined to be a part of God’s family.  I have struggled with this idea my entire life.  I embrace the God I see in this text that loves and accepts everyone and never gives up on anyone. And uses flawed characters to achieve shalom. 

 

References are made to this story in Paul’s writings in Romans 9:11-13.  This passage indicates that God had chosen Jacob over Esau even while in the womb that continued the narrative discussed of Divine selection.    Maybe this upending of the normal patriarchal system of the first born being given the blessing and birthright was to show God’s mercy to the underdog?  It is troubling to me in Verse 13 that says,  “As it is written, I have loved Jacob, but I have hated Esau.”     How does God hate Esau that has shown so much compassion and forgiveness?  There is no question in the passage we have reviewed that we see the face of God in Esau. 

 

I believe there is a blessing for Esau as he embraced shalom and God’s calling for forgiveness and wholeness.  Esau is a significant part of the narrative of God’s shalom and displays the character of God through his forgiveness and reconciliation with his brother even though Esau’s descendants are mostly ignored in our Bible.  God asks all of us to be peacemakers in our own contexts.  Even when we have been wrongly accused, our honor has been denounced, our status or possessions have been taken from us, we are called to shalom.  We may have righteous vengeance in our hearts but our openness to God’s calling of forgiveness can be profound even if it takes many years to come to this point of understanding.   We all are called to the Gospel of Peace.

 

I invite you to reflect on the queries listed in the bulletin.  If God is speaking to you directly please hold that message tenderly in your heart and reflect on what it means and what you do with it.  If God is giving you a message to share with all of us, please be faithful and stand and wait for a microphone to be brought to you.

Comment

Comment

8-25-19 - Abundance: The Fullness of the Kingdom

Abundance: The Fullness of the Kingdom

Indianapolis First Friends Quaker Meeting

Pastor Bob Henry

August 25, 2019

 

John 6:4-15 (NRSV)

4 Now the Passover, the festival of the Jews, was near. 5 When he looked up and saw a large crowd coming toward him, Jesus said to Philip, “Where are we to buy bread for these people to eat?” 6 He said this to test him, for he himself knew what he was going to do. 7 Philip answered him, “Six months’ wages[a] would not buy enough bread for each of them to get a little.” 8 One of his disciples, Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother, said to him, 9 “There is a boy here who has five barley loaves and two fish. But what are they among so many people?” 10 Jesus said, “Make the people sit down.” Now there was a great deal of grass in the place; so they[b] sat down, about five thousand in all. 11 Then Jesus took the loaves, and when he had given thanks, he distributed them to those who were seated; so also the fish, as much as they wanted. 12 When they were satisfied, he told his disciples, “Gather up the fragments left over, so that nothing may be lost.” 13 So they gathered them up, and from the fragments of the five barley loaves, left by those who had eaten, they filled twelve baskets. 14 When the people saw the sign that he had done, they began to say, “This is indeed the prophet who is to come into the world.”

15 When Jesus realized that they were about to come and take him by force to make him king, he withdrew again to the mountain by himself.

 

Last week we talked about detachment and at the end of my sermon I challenged us to tangibly give away or let go of something we had become attached to or that was keeping us from spiritually growing and loving our neighbors. Even though our time of waiting worship last week was mostly silent, I was overwhelming surprised (in a good way) by all the conversations I had this week with many of  you regarding the actions you have taken and the things in which you have chosen to let go. I sense there was a lot of burden in the form of anxiety, fear, jealousy, sadness, and hopelessness that needed to be removed.

This week, we move from Jesus clearing the temple to Jesus feeding the five thousand.  Now, that might seem like a drastic transition - from Jesus with whip in-hand knocking over the tables to Jesus with fish and loaves of bread feeding the masses.  In many ways two completely different pictures of Jesus. 

Again this week we are going to see some obstacles which get in our way of fulling living life in “real time” – but also we are going to juxtapose the obstacles with the abundance of God and how it provides for us and helps positively fill those spaces we have opened up through detachment.

To begin, let’s take a look at the scriptures for this morning.

To give some context, just prior to this story of Jesus feeding the five thousand, Jesus had been doing some rather miraculous but highly controversial things.

·        He had healed an invalid at the pool of Bethsaida causing a huge controversy because it was on the Sabbath.

·        He also healed a Roman Official’s son causing such a controversy that Jesus didn’t even go to the official’s home – rather he did a “distance healing.” The ramifications for him going to his home would have been numerous.

·        And finally, Jesus even brought some hated Samaritans to faith (a huge no-no).

If you thought the whip and turning over the tables were controversial…these three things alone were enough to get him crucified in his day.  Obviously, he got their attention because in verse 5 of our scripture it says a “great crowd” was coming toward him. I think it would be fair to say this was not a completely friendly crowd, actually it was growing to be a fairly large grouping of people.  It was most likely made up of…

·        Seekers

·        Naysayers

·        Politicians

·        Jews and Gentiles, and probably people who followed other religions

·        Sick people, invalids, people with disabilities wanting healed

·        The curious

·        People wanting forgiveness

·        People looking for a handout

·        People wanting a new vision

Scripture says that it was 5000 men – which really meant like 10,000+ people when you add the women and children and extended family. 

So, to make this more understandable – just imagine all the people who live in Speedway, Indiana actually coming together on the infield of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway.  That is about what we are talking about. 

It interested me that Jesus asked Philip, “Where shall we buy bread for these people to eat?” But after doing a little research, it is clear why.  Philip is the “local” among them.  He lived and came from a small town outside of Bethsaida – the exact location this event takes place.  Philip would know where to get bread and food.

Yet, Philip knew too well the reality of the request immediately going to finances.

In vs. 7 Philip answers him… ”It would take more than a half a year’s wages to buy enough bread.”

Now…Having a crowd of this size is one thing, but having a crowd this size hangry (hungry and angry) is another thing, and then add to that having a diverse group of people from beggars to politicians hangry raises the tensions even higher. Finally add to that a financial problem and knowing the little town’s assests are not going to be able to compensate creates a quick crisis – a major one. 

Just the other night, I was watching the documentary on PBS about Woodstock.  Woodstock was much larger than this, but in many ways was very much the same.

Where was the voice of reason?

In verse 8, Andrew takes a shot.

“Here is a boy with five small barley loaves and two small fish, but how far will that go among so many?”

Andrew almost seems to be grasping for straws by picking out the boy and his small lunch. 

Let’s stop here for a moment before moving into what Jesus does.

I see this scene as a perfect example of the Universal Church - a large group of people from all walks of life and cultures, with all kinds of issues, sicknesses, problems, orientations, lifestyles, some seeking, some curious, some following the crowd, some advocates, some cynics, some helpful…but all with basic needs like eating, sleeping, shelter, finances, and community.

But the piece that we often forget is Jesus is in the center of it all.  He is one of them. He knows the crisis that is brewing. He has been assessing the situation for several days as the crowds started to grow and follow.  He probably even knew that he was going to have to get them to an open space where they all could sit down comfortably.  Not an easy feat in Jesus’ day. 

See folks, too often we make Jesus into simply a magician or maybe more like Will Smith’s genie in Alladdin when reading this story. But the Jesus who emerges in this situation is more than a genie or magician who solves our problems or fulfills our wishes.

Instead, I believe Jesus acts as…

·        A Community Leader

·        A Unifier

·        A Calming Presence

·        A Priority Setter

I see Jesus in this moment more like a Martin Luther King Jr., Malala Yousafzaia,  Nelson Mandela, or Desmond Tutu…

The scripture says, Jesus sits them down – a gesture that speaks to his leadership, of bringing order, and settling. He had picked a comfortable place – a large grassy area – which are not easy to find in this part of the world.  Location was important.

I am sure this gesture would have signaled a break – and people would have immediately looked to their bags for food.

Now, remember not everyone could see what was going on – we’re talking 10,000 people plus sitting in a large area. Scripture doesn’t even say Jesus got everyone’s attention – because he simply couldn’t – there was no P.A. systems, no big Sony Jumbotrons, nothing like that.

Instead Jesus does exactly what he knew and taught.

·        He gave thanks for what they had. (that was his first priority always)

·        He led by example and gave away what he had or what he was given to those sitting around him.

Please note, scripture does not describe any “magic” – rather it describes abundance and good stewardship.  It says…

11 Then Jesus took the loaves, and when he had given thanks, he distributed them to those who were seated; so also the fish, as much as they wanted. 12 When they were satisfied, he told his disciples, “Gather up the fragments left over, so that nothing may be lost.”

 I sense his example was so contagious, so freeing that a chain-reaction took place.  As Jesus broke-bread and gave thanks – the hearts of the people were opened.  This is the true miracle – a miracle bigger than multiplying fish and loaves.  This was a miracle of people caring for one another – people who had come probably for their own gain, or own selfish reasons. 

God’s abundance was not only seen in full stomachs, but more importantly in the unifying of a large diversity of people from all different cultures, beliefs, positions, and statuses finally seeing and taking care of one another. 

Thus the people’s response, “This is indeed the prophet who is to come into the world.”  They didn’t say miracle worker or great healer – they used the word prophet – a person in the flesh who carried an important message from God.  And since many in the group were most likely Jewish and they believed that the prophet to come was also the messiah or the one to rule the nations.  They would have agreed as well that Jesus’ actions were of this nature, thus he should be their KING!

In reality, what these ten thousand plus people experienced was the Kingdom of God.  The Kingdom of God is all about abundance.  Author and theologian Walter Brueggemann wrote the following about abundance in his book, “The Liturgy of Abundance, the Myth of Scarcity.”

 

We who are now the richest nation are today’s main coveters. We never feel that we have enough; we have to have more and more, and this insatiable desire destroys us.  Whether we are liberal or conservative Christians, we must confess that the central problem of our lives is that we are torn apart by the conflict between our attraction to the good news of God’s abundance and the power of our belief in scarcity – a belief that makes us greedy, mean and unneighborly. We spend our lives trying to sort out that ambiguity. 

The conflict between the narratives of abundance and of scarcity is the defining problem confronting us…The gospel story of abundance asserts that we originated in the magnificent, inexplicable love of a God who loved the world into generous being…And the story of abundance says that our lives will end in God, and that this well-being cannot be taken from us.  In the words of St. Paul, neither life nor death nor angels nor principalities nor things – nothing can separate us from God. 

What we know about our beginnings and our endings, then, creates a different kind of present tense for us.  We can live according to an ethic whereby we are not driven, controlled, anxious, frantic or greedy, precisely because we are sufficiently at home and at peace to care about others as we have been cared for.

At the end of his quote, I believe Bruggemann is saying when we allow ourselves to detach (like from last week) from the things that drive, control, cause anxiety, make us frantic and greedy – then we are able to finally see our neighbor and find a new sense of peace. 

What Jesus did was to help the people gathered on that grassy space having lunch to see their true calling and to glimpse a picture of the Kingdom of God in action.

Abundance is described in the dictionary as fullness. Most of the time we think of fullness in terms of our stomachs being full, but Jesus showed that there was more to it…there was a…

·        Fullness in leading his followers through example.

·        Fullness in bringing unity among the diverse people of this world.

·        Fullness in holistically healing the people (body, mind, & spirit).

·        Fullness in meeting the basic needs of those around us.

·        Fullness in being a person of hope, grace, forgiveness, and love.

In our day and age (much like in Jesus’), these are radical concepts.  We live too often in a self-absorbed, cynical, stress induced, anxiety driven world. But if we allow Jesus to sit us down on the grassy knoll of our lives and learn by his example, we are able to see and, I believe, inhabit the foundations of Kingdom Living as Jesus taught. This story of feeding the crowds teaches us to…

·        Lead by example in our own areas of influence.

·        Bring unity (not division) in the places we live, work, and gather.

·        Be healers (not hurters).

·        Make sure that those around us have their basic needs met.

·        And be people of hope where grace, forgiveness, and love are central to living.

 

 

 

At First Friends, how can we answer the "Kingdom Call” to be bearers of the abundance of God?  What part do you play? In what way will you make visible God's abundance in someone else’s life this week? 

 

Comment

Comment

8-18-19 - The Freedom of Detachment

The Freedom of Detachment

Indianapolis First Friends Quaker Meeting

Pastor Bob Henry

August 18, 2019

 

John 2:13-22  (MSG)

 

13-14 When the Passover Feast, celebrated each spring by the Jews, was about to take place, Jesus traveled up to Jerusalem. He found the Temple teeming with people selling cattle and sheep and doves. The loan sharks were also there in full strength.

15-17 Jesus put together a whip out of strips of leather and chased them out of the Temple, stampeding the sheep and cattle, upending the tables of the loan sharks, spilling coins left and right. He told the dove merchants, “Get your things out of here! Stop turning my Father’s house into a shopping mall!” That’s when his disciples remembered the Scripture, “Zeal for your house consumes me.”

18-19 But the Jews were upset. They asked, “What credentials can you present to justify this?” Jesus answered, “Tear down this Temple and in three days I’ll put it back together.”

20-22 They were indignant: “It took forty-six years to build this Temple, and you’re going to rebuild it in three days?” But Jesus was talking about his body as the Temple. Later, after he was raised from the dead, his disciples remembered he had said this. They then put two and two together and believed both what was written in Scripture and what Jesus had said.

 

 

Two weeks ago, I began this series by looking at the Quaker distinctive of simplicity, and last week I added to that a subcategory, Sabbath, what I defined as spending time finding delight, wonder and joy in our world. This week, I want to explore another subcategory that deals with the hard work of cleaning out our personal lives and embracing the love of God and neighbor – that through the discipline of detachment.

 

Detachment is a process that frees us from whatever interferes with our

spiritual growth and helps us avoid disordered inclinations

and relationships with persons or things. (re-read)

 

For several weeks now, I have been personally reading about the life of the artist Vincent Van Gogh. Actually, the book that started my interest was a book about the great spiritual writer, Henri Nouwen and his love for the artist, Vincent van Gogh. It has surfaced that Henri Nouwen used to teach a spirituality class on van Gogh (How I wish I could have taken that class.) If you know anything about both men, they embraced a deep sense of detachment in their personal lives for the sake of spiritual growth and serving their neighbor. And both wrote about their process of “letting go” of fame and notoriety as a spiritual discipline - one finding delight, wonder, and joy in the faces of mentally challenged men and women at the L’Arche Community in Canada, and the other in what he labeled “potato eaters” and coal miners which he painted in the Netherlands. I find it interesting that these two men were known to have very few possessions or attachments in life, yet they found a deep sense of delight, wonder, and joy in the ordinary, while ironically becoming extremely famous after death.    

 

In this same vein, Richard Rohr once wrote in his book, Healing Our Violence through the Journey of Centering Prayer,

 

“All great spirituality teaches about letting go of what you don’t need and who you are not. Then, when you can get little enough and naked enough and poor enough, you’ll find that the little place where you really are is ironically more than enough and is all that you need. At that place, you will have nothing to prove to anybody and nothing to protect. That place is called freedom. It’s the freedom of the children of God. Such people can connect with everybody. They don’t feel the need to eliminate anybody . . .”

 

This freedom was evident in the life of Henri Nouwen, Vincent van Gogh, and many other people throughout the ages, but lately I am sensing a lack of that freedom and connection in the Universal Church and in our World.

 

In discussing Simplicity and Sabbath the last couple of weeks, I have assumed and briefly hinted on the idea of “detachment” and letting go as part of the process. But today, I want to focus more deeply on this.    

 

To do that, let’s start by returning to that interesting scripture that was read. One may wonder why I chose it and what it has to do with detachment and letting go. 

 

Jesus clearing the temple doesn’t seem to be speaking to us individually as much as it is Jesus “sticking-it” to the religious establishment for allowing the temple to become a marketplace full of sales people, pay-day lenders, and loan sharks (please note: there are several relevant issues in this text that we may explore in later sermons). For my teaching this morning, I believe there is a metaphor, (or better yet) an example, in this story about our own spiritual and daily journeys.  And I believe there is an urgent need to begin detaching from the things that clutter our personal temples and detract us from nurturing a trust in God and love for our neighbor.

 

The scripture is rather dramatic in it’s telling. Jesus on the spot creates and brandishes a whip and begins to clean out the temple. Now, this does NOT seem very Quakerly or for that matter how we typically view our calm, emaciated, gentle, and calm Jesus. What we need to remember is that scripture tells us that Jesus had already been to the temple and seen what was going on and did not act upon it. Instead he let his thoughts brew for a bit, and when he returned he knew exactly what he was going to do. Some of us would call Jesus’ action in the Temple an act of planned civil disobedience.

 

Even though chaos ensued as Jesus takes his whip and starts driving out the animals, scattering the coins, overturning tables, he was able to get everyone’s attention, including the disciples who were struggling with what was going on and what he was saying.

 

Folks, sometimes when things get really bad, we need to take drastic measures.  Remember Jesus wasn’t hurting people with his whip, he was getting their attention. He was doing what was necessary, and I believe he had a good reason. I think it is interesting, no one comments on how the merchants or loan sharks took it.  They were too busy gathering up their spilled money and scattered animals – worrying about their losses.  Because, let’s be honest, they probably knew that they should not be doing what they were doing in the Temple in the first place…and yes, I am sure they had been warned. 

 

What this scene unfolds is that Jesus was opening their eyes, getting their attention, reminding them in a serious way that something was wrong in their temple. 

 

As I continue to read scripture with new eyes, I have noticed that whenever Jesus comes on the scene or moves “into the neighborhood” the people around him are almost forced to see with new eyes or from new and challenging perspectives. Jesus was not the comfortable person to have around that we have made him out to be. He shook things up. Let’s be honest…he did things that would ultimately get him crucified. Often, he was asking probing questions, penetrating what was at the heart issues, questioning motives, and always seeking some type of response. And in this case, he was creating a “wake up call” or a “call to action.”

 

Now, Quakers and Christians from early on have used the term, “the body of Christ” to describe themselves.  This is due to the Apostle Paul describing the followers of Christ as a body with many parts in Corinthians. But just following that section of scripture, Paul continues on and takes it a step further.  In Corinthians 6:19 Paul says,

 

“Do you not know that your bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God?” 

 

As Quakers, we often talk about the Light or the Spirit of God dwelling within us.  Just think about this…if our temples are cluttered and needing cleaning – it might be hard to engage that inner light or spirit.     

 

Jesus was cleaning out or clearing his temple – what will become known as his body (the body of Christ). And I believe it was an example of what we are to do in our own personal lives.  If our bodies are truly temples – then there are going to be times when we need to get out our proverbial whips and do some deep cleaning and clearing for our own sake and the sake of our neighbor.  

 

I know for me there are times I need more than a “Facebook Like” of encouragement or more than a kind nudge or suggestion. Often, I need, like Jesus, to get out a whip, shake things up, and have a personal wake up call. 

 

Take for example, there is that day when you get up and your pants have become too tight (that was me this past week) – out comes the whip and we need to set in place a discipline of detachment from food entering our body.  And yes, I need a whip on me to remind me to exercise – especially after a couple of days of faithfully trying. Come on…we even have an idiom for this, we say, “I need to whip myself into shape.”  

 

Sometimes it’s not just food that is unhealthy, but it can be a boundaryless, abusive, draining person or relationship that is unhealthy, stealing life, time, and robbing us of joy, wonder, and delight.  And it’s time to get out the whip!     

 

Or maybe it is getting out the whip and cleaning house because we have been trying to “keep up with the Joneses.”  Did you know that there was an actual Jones family behind that idiom. Most think it comes from a comic strip, but in 1853, Elizabeth Shermerhorn Jones commissioned a 7,690 sq. ft. mansion to be built looking over the Hudson River.  Elizabeth came from wealth, so she went all out building the mansion in Norman Romanesque architecture. It was so unique, it singlehandedly caused a building boom. Everyone in the area began expanding and remodeling their homes to “keep up with the Joneses.”

 

“Keeping up with the Jones” is allowing oneself to be attached to the possessions, life experiences, relationships of someone other than yourself.  Some days living in Hamilton County it is so evident that it makes me sick. How it effects the education system, sports programs, lifestyles, and daily living is a real nightmare and it is taking a toll on our children, families, and those trying to keep up.  No wonder the need for counseling and mental health are on such a rise in our area.  We simply can’t keep up.      

 

And let’s be honest, when we try to keep up, we’re not usually trying to match our lifestyles to the 1 percent of Americans who can afford private jets and lavish diamonds. We’re just comparing ourselves to our nearest neighbors – probably the ones who look just a little bit wealthier than we do.

 

However, if we could peer inside the Joneses’ home and bank accounts, we might not get such an enviable picture.

 

And in reality, isn’t this all a continuation of what we wrestled with in our adolescence – what we then called “peer pressure?” Some things never change.  

Or maybe it is getting out the whip and cleaning house in the area of image. 

The fashion industry has always sought to allure us to create an image, a persona. Even early Quakers knew how much fashion set images, thus early Quakers only wore Quaker gray to promote equality, not status.

Have you noticed how Social Media can help you create an image or persona that often is not realistic or true? I wish life was more like what the majority of people posted – all the good and very little of the bad (well, except for political posts). 

Every photo has been cropped, blemishes replaced and filters added.  Someone once said that the smart phone has completely changed how we literally look at the world. People now take multiple photos and choose the best ones, crop out what they do not like, and make life seem almost perfect. But go to your parent’s house and look through the old photo albums and you will find a much different situation. Crying children at birthday parties or on Santa’s lap, high schoolers with pimples, new mothers looking exhausted, sweat and dirt…I think you get what I am saying. 

I was at a very unique conference a few years ago and our speaker was Dan Allender (who wrote the book on Sabbath I talked about last week). He said in his family any time some type of disaster happened, he or his wife would grab the camera to capture the moment.  From spilled milk reactions, to broken arms from falling off bikes, to temper tantrums he had images of it all.  They kept all these pictures in an album that was labeled “Real Life.”  He said when showing his friends, people would be appalled or shocked, even saying, “Why would you do such a thing?” He was clear, it reminded his family that life is not always the image we make of it.    

Folks, I think you get what I am saying. 

When you and I get the whip out in our own Temples, I see it more as what we might call today a “reality check” or an “eye opener.”  All of a sudden, we become aware of how the symptoms we experience, like anxiety, fear, anger, jealousy, hopelessness, sadness, disconnection are part and parcel to the negative attachments we have made to things like I have described.  And even more, when we are in bondage to those symptoms, it effects our neighbors, our family, our loved ones, our friends.

I believe God has been teaching us and calling us to detach ourselves from those things that get in the way of fully engaging this life. Those things that deprive us of our true delight, wonder, and joy, that blind us from seeing the beauty in and around us.   

When we take out that whip and engage the hard work with the Spirit’s help – it is just like with Jesus – the temple walls we have created may begin to crumble, sometimes they will completely fall apart, or even be destroyed – leaving us feeling almost dead. 

 

But as Jesus said, “Destroy this temple…and I will raise it again.”   

 

And that is when we are reminded of what true resurrection is all about.  Author Rob Bell said it well, “To have resurrection…we must have death.”

 

To die to our selfish attachments, to die to always having it our way, to die to finding our identity in image, possessions, or achievements, is the beginning of experiencing the ongoing resurrection in our lives.

 

If you and I look carefully, we have opportunities for resurrection each and every day – if our attachments don’t clutter our vision.

 

This week I want to challenge us to work on the discipline of detachment.  It’s time to get out our whips! 

 

I want to challenge you this week to consider how you might tangibly give away or let go of something you are attached to.

 

As we go into a time of open worship

·        Be aware of the feelings that arise in you when you think of giving away or letting go this attachment.

·        Spend some time meditating on it.  Ask the Spirit for guidance.  

·        Then commit this morning to letting go.   If you sense a need for more accountability feel free to stand where you are and speak out loud what you plan to give up or let go (you don’t have to go into details – you may not know those yet, but speak out what  you want to give up letting the Body of Christ surround you in silent prayer.

 

Comment